SPECIAL SECTION
Looking back at the first few years of working as a cardiologist at home in Qatar, is like watching an old movie. The scenes are clear, the events exciting, the struggles intense, and the heroes real. Some characters are still around; some are no longer with us.
Hajar A. Hajar, MD*
Abroaditis
The first hospital that was built in Qatar was
in 1945.
It was small with 30 beds and staffed by one doctor
only.
In 1954 more extensions were added and a
few more general doctors were recruited. However,
the lack of qualified specialists made the government
send a few patients abroad through a medical committee.
But at that time, most patients were sent abroad
to Lebanon and Egypt.
The opening of Rumaillah hospital in 1956 was
a major achievement in the history of health care
in Qatar.
A few qualified specialists where recruited
to take care of patients and their presence reassured
Qataris that their health was in good hands for
the first time.
The trust of the people in the medical staff was
at its zenith then, but unfortunately, that trust
did not last long. By 1970 four agencies represented
Qatar government abroad to assist Qatari patients
in Lebanon, Egypt, Austria, and UK. The number
of patients sent abroad were very limited until
1971 when their number started to skyrocket.
During the years 1964 – 1978, I was in the USA
as a college student, medical student and then
a postgraduate trainee.
I was preoccupied with my studies and did
not know much about the social and political changes
in Qatar.
My main source of information about what
was happening at home was through my father's
letters.
My father wrote to me about family events;
rarely did he write about political news. He had
no interest in politics. He thought it was more
important to inform me of a child born to my sister
rather than a change of a head of state.
Radio and TV news in the USA at that time were
preoccupied with the Vietnam War. I never heard
news about Qatar on American TV then.
Most Americans had never heard of Qatar
before the Gulf War.
We did not even have the luxury of international
telephone communication.
We could not afford paying for over seas phone
bills with our monthly allowance of $200 as students.
In 1964, I had a very discouraging experience
when I tried to make my first international call
to Qatar from Texas.
Direct international telephone dialing was
not available then.
The operator in Baytown Texas said that she had
never heard of a country called Qatar. She asked
a Houston operator to help her.
The Houston operator looked at her codes
and maps without luck. She asked me if I was sure
that there was a country with that name.
She requested me to respell the name of the country
for her again because she could not believe that
there is no "u" after the "Q".
After more than twelve minutes of looking
and asking colleagues, she gave up and connected
me to a New York operator who had more experience
with international calls than she.
Even the New York operator was not able
to find Qatar anywhere. She asked me if it was
a part of Saudi Arabia. I said: "No. . . No".
She called a London operator and asked:
"Honey. . . , have you ever heard of a country
called Qatar?" "Yes of course" replied the London
operator immediately. "Where is it?" Asked the
American operator.
"Just next to Bahrain Island", he answered.
I was not happy with the answer because Qatar
is bigger in size than Bahrain and should be easierto
see in maps.
But I did not say anything. So, with the help
of the London operator, I was able to make my
first overseas call from the USA to Qatar.
My mother thought it was a miracle.
She never expected that I could call and talk
to her from such a far away place. She asked me
twice if it was really me! While I was writing
this paragraph about my international telephone
call from Texas in 1964, my son called me from
Texas using his mobile telephone. He wanted me
to check an e-mail he sent me. The distance between
Texas and Qatar did not change in 37 years but
almost everything else did! I learned about some
of the changes in Qatar when I came for summer
holidays. I used to come for summer vacation four
weeks once every two to three years. Through friends
and colleagues, I found out more detailed information
about what was happening in Qatar when I returned
home for good in 1978. In 1971 Qatar became an
independent state after decades of British “protection.”
Soon after, the independent State of Qatar with
a population of 80,000 had a Minister Of Health.
The new minister welcomed any patient who
went to his office seeking help. He started to
send almost all willing patients abroad for treatment,
with or without medical board approval.
The news spread in town like wild fire in
dry grass. It was an excellent opportunity to
go abroad with all expenses paid for by the government.
The Minister Of Health became the most popular
minister in the country. In the following few
months and for many years, large numbers of citizens
became "sick." Many diseases became "unresponsive"
to drugs given in Qatar.
Miraculous therapy and exaggerated treatment success
stories by patients returning from abroad were
the dominant theme in the country then.
Some diseases vanished soon after the airplane
landed in Europe.
The blind gained 20/20 vision, the paralyzed walked,
and the impotent became as potent as a teenager.
Such magical therapy did not exist in Doha.
Trust in the local medical staff was eroded.
The new opportunity to travel abroad on the expense
of the government, especially during the summer,
was irresistible.
The first well-trained surgeon to come to
work in Qatar was Dr. Red Prendeville, an Australian.
He arrived in Qatar in 1957 to work in Rumaillah
Hospital, one year after it was opened.
He was loved and very well-respected in
Qatar. I knew him very well when I was in secondary
school.
He operated on several friends and relatives.
He removed my tonsils in 1960.
He retired in 1973 and went back to Australia.
Dr. Prendeville visited us in Doha recently in
May 2001.
His memory was still very sharp. I asked
him about treatment abroad during the early days.
He told me that he was in Doha when Treatment
Abroad suddenly jumped beyond control in 1971.
The Treatment Abroad Committee was reformed and
he was the chairman. The medical board committee
would write: "Treatment abroad is not recommended,"
but the patient was sent abroad anyway. Dr. Prendeville
recalled. "It became chaotic and the hospital
was devastated. Patients came to us requesting
referral abroad instead of treatment.
Some patients wanted to go abroad for treatment
for truly minor problems like a cyst on the back.
All he needed was for his wife to squeeze
it. When we refused to send a patient with a minor
problem abroad, the minister overruled our decision."
Dr. Prendeville happily performed first class
surgery for four years in Qatar but suddenly found
it difficult to convince patients to accept surgery
or medical care in Doha.
Medical and surgical care suffered. It was difficult
for a professional surgeon to work in such an
atmosphere. Dr. Prendeville told me:
"It became so bad that in February 1972
I left the country, heading to the UK. While I
was in Lebanon on my way to the UK, I was called
and requested to go back to Doha with the news
that there were some political changes in the
country and treatment abroad would be controlled".
Over the following decade, the major function
of the ministry of health was sending patients
abroad.
Medical attaché posts were created in several
Qatar embassies in Europe, Egypt and Lebanon.
Rumaillah Hospital became overwhelmed with
preparing patients to travel abroad. Some patients
felt insulted if they were told to stay in the
country for treatment. No VIP would accept to
be treated in Doha.
The local perception was that those who
accepted treatment in Doha must be foreigners
or citizens from lower and poor classes. In fact,
well-connected foreigners, whether government
employees or not, were sent abroad for treatment
on the expense of the government with daily allowances
for the patient and his or her companion.
Later in this essay, I will narrate the case of
a foreign young man who was sent abroad for treatment
a few days after arrival in Qatar and probably
before the ink of his residence permit dried.
The following stories illustrate the difficulties
andfrustrations faced by the local medical profession.
The stories underline the magnitude of the “abroaditis”
problem – a problem that evolved into a “disease”
of epidemic proportions unique to our region.
Qatar in particular had a severe case of
that epidemic.
In the summer of 1973, an old Qatari man went
to the Minister of Health's office. He told the
minister: "I pray that God prolongs your life.
You send many people to London for treatment.
I also want to go to London but I am not
sick. Do I have to lie and claim that I am sick?
If I were sick, I would rather stay home than
go to London. Sick people cannot enjoy trips.
Do I have to get sick to see London?" The
minister laughed at the logic of the honest old
man.
He wrote an order for him to be sent to London
for two months as a patient with two companions.
The ministry paid for the tickets and daily allowances
for the patient and his escorts. It is not surprising
that illness in Qatar was statistically seasonal
then. The number of “sick” patients increased
proportionally with the increase in local temperature.
During the summer, the country was almost deserted.
Many people spent the summer months as “patients”
on the government's expense in cooler countries
in Europe. Every minister or politician who wanted
to gain popularity in the country must help send
patients abroad. Orders to send patients or groups
of patients and relatives abroad for treatment
came at that time from HH the Amir, HH the Crown
Prince, the Minister Of Finance, the Minister
Of Interior and of course the Minister Of Health.
Those written instructions bypassed the
medical board committee during those days. On
joining the department of medicine in Rumaillah
hospital in 1978, I heard a new local medical
term: "abroaditis" i.e., patients eager or "itching"
to be sent abroad.
This term was frequently mentioned in the differential
diagnosis in the presence of patients. Patients
did not realize what it meant since it sounded
like medical jargon.
Most patients with abroaditis had no physical
findings to support their complaints.
In 1979 I met a senior cardiologist, Dr.
Harris, in a hospital in London. He was a pleasant,
helpful and well-respected cardiologist. I finalized
a cooperation agreement with his department.
The agreement was backed by his hospital
in London and the ministry of health in Doha.
He agreed to send his senior registrar to Doha
to help me take care of patients in return for
certain fees to his hospital. With that agreement
I gained a young and well-trained cardiologist,
Dr. Keith Woollard.
He joined me in Qatar a few months later.
He was a good cardiologist and very helpful. Even
before Dr. Woollard joined me, I invited Dr. Harris
to come to Doha as a visiting cardiologist for
a week.
An unplanned and spontaneous experiment took place
during his visit. Some patients who had had a
cardiac evaluation and therapy abroad requested
me to send them to the same cardiologists for
reevaluation annually in the summer.
I refused because I could evaluate them in Qatar.
They managed to travel, however, through orders
from higher authorities as usual. In anticipation
of Dr. Harris’ visit, I instructed my clerk to
contact all of Dr. Harris’ patients in Doha for
appointment to see him.
We collected their names from Dr. Harris’
office and from the medical reports of patients
in our files.
Most patients refused and insisted to be
referred to London to see Dr. Harris. They told
the clerk that bringing Dr. Harris to Doha is
a trick to deprive them of their right to get
treated abroad.
Some explained to me that they refused to see
him because he will not be as valuable to them
in Doha without his equipment, his good nurses,
and his highly qualified technicians in London,
etc. The reader could make his conclusion from
that unplanned experiment.
I classified those as severe and very advanced
cases of abroaditis. I do remember a few patients
whom I sent abroad. One of them was a patient
with aortic valve stenosis (AS).
In 1980, I evaluated an old Qatari patient with
AS. He looked over 75 years old, thin and malnourished.
He was quiet with some loss of recent memory.
Based on my clinical examination, EKG, CXR and
M-mode echo, the AS was severe. Even though I
had primitive cardiac catheterization then, as
I had described in a previous article (The Blue
Girl Heartviews 2000, 1 (9):375-377), I decided
to send the patient to London without cardiac
catheterization. I was sure he needed valve replacement.
We had no cardiac surgeon in Qatar then. I informed
the son the good news that I will refer his father
to London for surgery. I thought he would be happy.
The son said that his father was a VIP and
not an ordinary person to be sent by the ministry
of health! The son said that he could arrange
for his father to be sent on expense of His Highness
the Amir to London.
This was the most arrogant response Ihad ever
heard from a patient’s relative.
I told the son that I do not care who sends his
father, but he should take my medical report to
the cardiologist in London and bring me postoperative
report for my future follow up in Doha.
I realized later that he took my report
only to the Amir’s palace to justify his request
for the trip abroad, but he did not take my report
to London.
I could not forget the arrogant response
of the son for several days. I told my father
the name of the patient and asked if he knew him.
My father told me that he knew the old man.
He was a very decent man. He had admirable
speech. "He could sell you anything", my father
added. He worked as a "dallal" i.e., he used to
sell real estate to people and gets commission.
The first time my father met him was in Dubai
(UAE) 30 years earlier.
Two months later the old man showed up in my clinic
with a servant.
He looked very well for an old man with recent
open-heart surgery.
The servant handed me a report. It was written
by a general physician in London.
The report stated that the clinical history was
obtained through an interpreter.
When the patient was asked about his complaints,
he said “constipation.” On physical examination
the physician heard a cardiac murmur but he was
distracted by the patient’s non-cardiac complaints
and the objective finding of hard stool in the
colon on palpation. The heart murmur was ignored.
An immediate enema was arranged.
The result was gratifying. Stool softener was
prescribed for the old man and he was discharged
from the clinic to return to Doha.
The old man’s memory had deteriorated further.
I told the servant to inform the son that I needed
to talk to him about his father.
I had to send him back to a cardiologist in London.
I sent the son a note with my telephone number.
Unfortunately, I never heard from the son. The
old man died suddenly at home four months later.
Another incident involved a young foreigner who
was brought to work as a soldier for the Qatar
army.
On routine physical examination for employment
a cardiac murmur was heard. He was referred to
me to evaluate him for fitness. I found that he
had tight AS.
I wrote in my report that he was not fit. He needed
valve replacement.
Three months later, the same young man, a non-citizen,
came to me to re-evaluate him for fitness again.
The young man told me that he had a high-ranking
relative in the army.
His relative was able to get the government of
Qatar to send him for valve replacement in London
so he could be employed as a soldier.
He was sent to London before he had a chance to
see Qatar.
He stayed over two months in London for
surgery and post- operative follow up.
His treatment bills, tickets and daily allowance
were paid for by Qatar.
An Arab general surgeon, Dr. A. Yashruti,
who worked in Qatar from 1976 to 1982, told me
that he had operated on a Qatari lady in the American
University of Beirut hospital in Lebanon just
before he moved to Qatar.
He told her that he would remove her abdominal
stitches in Doha. The lady came to his clinic
in Doha asking him to do her a favor.
He was shocked when she asked him to refer
her to London for removal of the stitches. He
refused and offered to remove them for her on
the spot but she did not agree.
Two weeks later he saw the patient in a
shopping area. She told him:
"Your stitches fell down by themselves." In the
first year of establishing a cardiology clinic
in Qatar in 1979, I referred 55 patients abroad.
Of those 23 (41%) had cardiac surgery.
The number of patients coming to cardiology clinic
increased in the following years and so did the
number of patients I referred for genuine cardiac
problems that I could not solve in Doha.
Those were mainly patients with congenital heart
disease and patients requiring surgical procedures.
In a report I wrote in 1980 to justify the need
to have cardiac surgery in Doha, which was opposed
strongly by my colleagues in the surgical department,
I found some interesting statistics.
In the first 9 months of 1980, I had referred
abroad a total of 75 cardiac patients. Of those,
68 (90%) had cardiac surgery.
Of the surgical patients 29 (43%) had valve
surgery; 31 CABG (45.5%); Eight patients (11.6%)
had congenital heart surgery.
It is amazing to see those data now since
we do not see that many patients requiring valve
surgery these days. It took me three more years
of struggle before we succeeded in establishing
a cardiac surgery section.
We succeeded only after I became the managing
director of the new Hamad General Hospital (HGH).
In those days, the official working hours for
Rumaillah hospital was from 7 AM to 1 PM. By 1:00
PM, all the medical staff went home – only patients
and nurses on duty were left in the hospital.
Even those on call went home at that time
and could only be contacted by phone or bleep.
The working hours were too short for me to finish
my work. I made my own working hours then. I used
to bring cold sandwiches from home for lunch in
my office.
I scheduled outpatients to come to my office in
the afternoon.
We had no cardiology clinic building then.
One afternoon I saw a female patient in my office.
She was on an examination coach while her old
semi blind husband was sitting in a chair next
to the coach.
She was about 45 years old with muscloskeletal
pain. I reassured her that she had no cardiac
problem. Her husband who was in his late sixties
pleaded to me to send her to London to make sure
that she had no heart disease.
He wanted also to be seen by an ophthalmologist
in London while escorting his wife. He said that
he was afraid that his wife may fall dead at home.
I told the husband that there was no need for
referral and she was in no danger.
He got very upset and started to tell me
how cruel I was refusing to help a poor patient.
While he was shouting, he suddenly became speechless.
He looked pale and his head dropped foreword.
I had no nurse with me. I asked the wife to get
up and help. We carried him and put him on the
coach.
His pulse and respiration were fine. His
BP was moderately elevated.
He obviously had a stroke during rage and anger
brought on by my refusal to send them abroad.
I called for help to transfer him to the CCU as
there was no MICU in our hospital then. He recovered
partially during the first week, but he was sent
to London by the medical department later for
stroke rehabilitation with his wife as escort.
Of course, my medical colleagues in the
department of medicine and I felt sorry for him.
The referral was due to sympathy rather than necessity.
He did benefit from physiotherapy that could
have been done in Doha.
His wife was reassured that she had no heart disease.
Referral abroad without the approval of
the medical board continued over the years. Higher
authorities continued to send patients all over
the world.
Some ministers of health restricted their own
referral of patients and some abused it.
One minister sent a child abroad because the mother
complained to him that his hair was not straight.
The same minister, while walking in London’s
Hyde park during the summer vacation, converted
some Qatari tourists who greeted him in the park
to “patients” on government expense to help with
their expenses. Interestingly, the local newspapers’
criticism of the government health care becomes
exaggerated when the weather warms up and decreases
remarkably during the winter when people do not
like to travel.
Over the last ten years we established several
new medical services in HMC that were not available
before, such as in vitro fertilization (IVF),
Pediatric cardiac surgery, invasive radiology,
and advanced neurosurgery, etc.
In 1993, we opened the IVF unit in HMC and
stopped referring patients abroad for that purpose.
In 1992, the year before we opened our IVF unit
we sent 233 patients to London with husbands for
such therapy that cost us 5,299,372.14 Sterling
pound (QRS 27,556,735) for that year.
Nowadays we send relatively very few patients
abroad.
Those who are sent abroad require specialized
care, which is not yet available in Qatar, such
as radiotherapy and electrophysiology testing
for arrhythmia. The reason for our recent success
in this regard is not only due to the advancement
in our medical services but also due to the great
support from HH the Amir of the State of Qatar,
Sheikh Hamad Bin Khalifa Al Thani. He is well
aware of the abroaditis problem that we face.
He is convinced that the abuse of referral
abroad hinders the progress of medical care in
Qatar and wastes the State’s resources.
He gave orders to restrict referral abroad
to the special medical committee in Hamad Medical
Cooperation. His Highness himself sets a good
example.
He rarely orders sending patients for treatment
abroad directly.
In the summer of 1979 there were 16000 "patients"
and relatives from Qatar in London alone. In 1981,
one year before we opened our new hospital (HGH)
we had 10,324 Qatari patients in London. That
number is actually one third of the total since
I did not add the escorts.
Recently, in June 6, 2001, Al Sharq Al Awsat,
an Arabic newspaper based in London, wrote that
in 1996 Qatar sent 1900 patients to London and
in the year 2000 that number dropped to 190. Abroaditis
is responding well to local therapy.
Hopefully, it will soon be eradicated for good.
Ali Ibn Abi Talib, a cousin and disciple of the
prophet Mohammed, peace be upon him, said: "Seek
travel. . . you may gain five benefits: Amusement,
revenue, knowledge, character building and good
companionship." In the 7th century AD, the phenomenon
of treatment abroad was unknown to be added to
that list.
Chief of Cardiology, Rumailah Hospital & Hamad Medical Corporation
(HMC) since 1978 to present; Managing Director
HMC (1979-1990); Undersecretary of Health
(1981-1993); Currently, Chairman of the
Board HMC & Minister of Health, Qatar.
|
|