CASE REPORT
Editor: Dr. Jassim al-Suwaidi*
ST- segment Elevation During Stress
Test in Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis
Dr Ayman Elmenyar, MBBch
Left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis is
associated with poor long-term prognosis without
surgery (1-3). Patients with LMCA stenosis cannot
be detected on the basis of their clinical presentation
alone, which may not be different from those with
milder coronary artery disease (CAD), hence additional
investigations are needed (4-6). Exercise treadmill
test may suggest the presence of such lesion and
other serious CAD by giving a high index of suspicion
(6-9.)
A 48-year-old Indian male patient presented
to the cardiology outpatient clinic with atypical
chest pain of a few day’s duration. Apart from
a family history of CAD, he had no other risk
factors such as smoking, diabetes or hypertension.
Physical examination was not remarkable. He was
referred for exercise treadmill test. On the day
of ETT, the patient was stable, his BP 130/80,
pulse 70/min. and resting ECG was normal (Figure
1). At the end of stage 1, he felt tired and developed
mild chest pain with ST-elevation in V2 – V4 (Figure
2). The test was

Fig. 1. see text

Fig. 2. see textt
stopped and the patient was given
sublingual Nitroglycerin with relief of chest
pain and resolution of ST-elevation within one
minute. However, almost immediately, he developed
ST depression in leads II, III, AVF, V5 and V6
(Figure 3), which lasted for 5 minutes followed
by complete normalization of the ECG (figure 4).
He was admitted to the coronary care unit (CCU).
Anti-ischemic therapy with aspirin, betablocker
and nitrate was initiated, including subcutaneous
Enoxaparin. Cardiac enzymes were normal and Troponin
T-test was negative; serum cholesterol was 4.8
and triglyceride was 2.0. Echocardiogram revealed
left ventricular ejection fraction of 58% with
hypokinesia of the apex and inferolateral wall.
A coronary angiogram revealed 80% left main coronary
artery stenosis with total occlusion of the left
anterior descending coronary artery, 80% lesion
in the circumflex, and 60% distal RCA lesion (fig
5). The patient underwent urgent coronary artery
bypass graft (CABG). Postoperative recovery was
uneventful.
Exercise treadmill test (ETT) has been used to identify patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) as well as predict its severity and the urgency for intervention (5,10,11). Patients with

Fig. 3. see text

Fig. 4. see text
3-vessel disease with significant
LMCA stenosis have a 60% 4-year survival compared
to a 70% 4-year survival in those without LMCA
disease (12). Good exercise performance indicates
a better prognosis in patients with LMCA and/or
3-vessel disease than those with similar lesions
but have poor exercise performance (11,13). Most
of the patients with LMCA stenosis have extensive
disease elsewhere in their coronary artery tree
as well (14). It is not surprising that patients
with left main and 3-vessel disease have similar
exercise performance but the difference in prognosis
reflects the difference in mortality associated
with a chance event such as plaque rupture with
thrombus formation when it occurs in the left
main coronary artery rather than elsewhere. The
clinical and noninvasive indicators of LMCA stenosis
such as crescendo angina, transient ST-depression
with pain, simultaneous anterior and inferior
ST-T changes during pain and fluoroscopic calcification
of LMCA are well recognized but still have a low
sensitivity and low predictive value to be of
diagnostic value (15). During ETT, patients with
LMCA disease tend to show an earlier onset, longer
duration and more widespread ST-depression than
those with 3-vessel disease. However, there is
no single variable that helps to distinguish LMCA
from 3-vessel CAD or to predict the presence of
LMCA stenosis. The predictive accuracy of ETT
findings can be increased to 74% if more than
one of the following variables are recognized
(5): development of downsloping ST depression,
ST-depression >2mm, onset of ST changes in stage
1, persistence of ST-changes beyond 3 minutes,
appearance of ST-changes in at least 3 ECG leads
or exertional ST-elevation (9,17). Thomson and
Keleman (16) found that 33% of their patients
with exercise-induced hypotension had at least
75% stenosis of LMCA. Goldschlager et al (7) reported
also that the duration of exercise-induced ischemia
is extended longer in the recovery period in patients
with LMCA stenosis. Stone et al observed that
the presence of coexistent RCA disease exerted
a major adverse effect on ETT performance in patients
with LMCA disease and these patients had higher
incidence of ventricular arrhythmia, exertional
hypotension, and exertional ST elevation more
than those with normal RCA (18).
ST elevation during ETT is not a
common finding and it is important to differentiate
elevation occurring over or adjacent to Q waves
from elevation in non-Q areas. Candell et al,
reported that in patients without previous infarction
and with exercise-induced ST-elevation, very severe
perfusion defects were detected when the radionuclide
has been injected during the crisis of Thalium
stress test (19). ST elevation during ETT on normal
resting ECG represents severe transmural ischemia
(table1) (9,17,20) it is very arrythmogenic and
more accurate in localizing the affected vessel
than ST depression (table 2) (21, 22).
On normal ECG
|
On old Q-MI
|
| Indicate severe transmural ischemia |
Indicate wall motion
abnormality, left
ventricular aneurysm,
or residual viability
|
| May indicate variant angina |
Not known |
| Very arrythmognic |
Less |
| Localize the affected artery |
Less accurate |
| Very rare event |
Not rare |
On normal ECG
|
On old Q-MI
|
| Leads |
Left anterior descending artery (LAD) |
| Lateral leads |
Left circumflex and diagonals |
| II, III, AVF limb leads |
Right coronary artery |

Fig. 5. Coronary angiogram. White arrows indicate severe lesions in LMCA, LAD, and circumflex.
ST-elevation in non-Q areas is a very rare event.
It occurs in 0.1%-0.5% of cases (23-24). During
ETT, ST-elevation occurring purely during exercise
indicates more severe lesions than when it occurs
in the recovery period (25). ST elevation on normal
ECG may occur in patients with variant angina
during ETT (26). On the other hand, ST elevation
in the presence of Q-waves represents wall motion
abnormalities, left ventricular aneurysm, or residual
viable myocardium within an infarct (27,28). In
the CASS study, ST elevation during both exercise
and recovery phase showed a significant reduction
in coronary event-free survival and it was also
noted that exercise-induced ST elevation when
tested 2 weeks after uncomplicated myocardial
infarction indicated higher morbidity and mortality
(29-31). Our patient had normal resting ECG and
no major risk factors apart from his family history.
The pretest probability of CAD was low. The grossly
abnormal ECG changes during ETT were rather surprising.
The early development of chest pain in stage 1
with accompanying ST-elevation in leads V2-V4
indicated tight proximal left system stenosis
whereas the subsequent development of ST-depression
in the inferolateral leads suggested concomitant
significant lesions in the RCA and circumflex
arteries. The ST depression was not due to reciprocal
change since it occurred after resolution of ST-elevation.
Coronary angiography confirmed the pathology highly
suspected from the results of the ETT.
Exercise testing might give a high index of suspicion
for the presence of LMCA before angiography. ST
elevation during ETT in the absence of prior infarction
should be taken seriously as a clue to the presence
of LMCA stenosis or its equivalent.
1. Takaro T, Hultgren HN, Lipton MJ, Detre KM, and participants in the study groups: the VA cooperative randomized study of surgery for coronary arterial occlusive disease: II. Subgroup with significant left main lesions. Circulation 1976; 54 (Suppl 3):III-107-116.
2. European Coronary Surgery Study Group: Long-term results of prospective randomized study of coronary artery bypass surgery in stable angina pectoris. Lancet 1982; 2:1173-1180.
3. Mock MB, Killip T. Effect of coronary bypass surgery on survival patterns in subsets of patients with left main coronary artery disease: report of the collaborative study in coronary artery surgery (CASS). Am J Cardiol 1981; 48:765-777.
4. Stone PH, Goldschlager N: Left main coronary artery disease: Review and appraisal. Cardiovasc Med 1979; 4:165.
5. Weiner DA, McCabe CH, Ryan TJ: Identification of patients with left main and three-vessel coronary disease with clinical and exercise test variables. Am J Cardiol 1980; 46:21-27.
6. Cheitlin MD, Davia JE, deCastro CM, Barrow EA, Andersen WT: Correlation of “critical” left coronary artery lesions with positive submaximized exercise tests in patients with chest pain. AM heart J 1975; 89:305.
7. Goldschlager N, Selzer A, Cohn K: Treadmill stress tests as indicators of presence and severity of coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med 1976; 85:277.
8. Cohn K, Kamm B, Feteih N, Brand R, Goldschlager N: Use of treadmill score to quantify ischemic response and predict extent of coronary disease. Circulation 1979; 59:286.
9. Longhurst JC, Kraus WL: Exercise-induced ST elevation in patients without myocardial infarction. Circulation 1979; 60:616.
10.Cohn K, Kamm B, Feteih N, Brand R, Goldschlager N: Use of treadmill score to quantify ischemic response and predict extent of coronary disease. Circulation 1979; 59:286-296.
11.Raymond J, Gibbon SF, Earl F, Manuel L, Brown C, et al. Comparison of exercise performance in left main and 3 – vessel coronary artery disease. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis 1991; 22:14 – 20.
12. Mock MB, Ringquist I, Fisher LD, David KB,
Chaitman BR, Kouchoukos NT, Kaiser GC, Alderman
E, Ryan TJ, Russell RO, Jr, Mullin S, Fray D,
Killip T, III, Participants in the CASS: Survival
of medically treated patients in the Coronary
Artery Surgery Study (CASS) registry. Circulation
1982; 66:562-568.
13. Bonow RO, Kent KM, Rosing DR, Lan KKG, Lakatos
E, Borer JS, Bacharach SL, Green MC, Epstein SE:
Exercise-induced ischemia in mildly symptomatic
patients with coronary artery disease and preserved
left ventricular function: Identification of sub-groups
at risk of death during medical therapy. N Engl
J Med 1984; 311:1339- 1345.
14. Bulkley BH, Roberts WC: Atherosclerotic narrowing
of the left main coronary artery. Necropsy analysis
of 152 patients with fatal coronary heart disease
and varying degrees of left main narrowing. Circulation
1976; 53:823- 828.
15. Plotnick GD, Greene HL, Carliner NH, Becker
LC, and Fisher ML. Clinical indicators of left
main coronary artery disease in unstable angina.
Ann Intern Med 1979; 91:149- 153.
16. Thomson PD, Kelemen MH. Hypotension accompanying
the onset of exertional angina. Circulation 1975;
52:28- 32.
17. Chahine RA, Raiznar AE, Ishimori T: The clinical
significance of exercise-induced ST-segment elevation.
Circulation 1976; 54:209.
18. Stone PH,Lafolette LE,Cohn K.Pattern of exercise
treadmill test performance in patients with left
main coronary artery disease:detection dependent
on left dominance or coexistent dominant right
coronary artery. Am Heart J 1982; 104:13-19.
19. Candell Riera J, Castell J, Rius A, Buxeda
M, et al. ST segment elevation during exercise
test and perfusion scintigraphy in patients without
infarction. Rev Esp Cardiol 1995 Sep;48(9):600
– 605.
20. Hegge FN, Tuna N, Burchell HB. Coronary arteriographic
` findings in patients with axis shifts or ST
elevation on exercise testing. Am Heart J 1973;86:603.
21. Roelli H, Tartini R, et al. The significance
of ST elevation in the exercise ECG. Schweiz Med
Wochenschr 1985; 11:115 (19): 644 – 650.
22. Victor FF, Susan Q. ECG responses in: Handbook
of exercise testing. Little Brown of Boston 1992;
(Chap.15); 108 – 109.
23. Lobbe L, Douard H, Espil G, Chevalier L, et
al. Significance of exercise induced ST elevation
in patient without a history of previous myocardial
infarction. Arch Mal Coeur Vaisis 1999; 92 (10):
1287 – 1294.
24. Ekmekei A., Toyoshima H. Et al. Angina pectoris.
IV. Clinical and experimental difference between
ischemia with ST elevation and ischemia with ST
depression. Am J. Cardiol 1961;7:412.
25. Irace L, Aquino D, Scialdyne , et al. ST elevation
during ergometric test:Correlation with coronary
angiography. Minerva Cardiolioangiol 1993 May;
41(5): 177 – 185.
26. Mark DB, Hlatky MA, Lee KL, Harrel FE, et
al. Localizing coronary artery obstructions with
the exercise treadmill test. Ann Intern Med 1987
January; 106(1): 53 – 55.
27. Detry JR, Mengeot P, Rousseau MF, Cosyns J,
Ponlot R, Brasseur LA: Maximal exercise testing
in patients with spontaneous angina pectoris associated
with transient ST segment elevation: risks and
electrocardiographic findings. Br Heart J 1975;
37: 897.
28. Manvi KN, Ellestad MH: Elevated ST segments
with exercise in ventricular aneurysm. J Electrocardiol
1972; 5: 317.
29. The Principal Investigators of CASS and their
Associates: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood
Institute Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS).
Circulation 63(Suppl III): I I-1, 1981. 30. Hossack
KF, Sivarjian ES, Almes MJ, Belanger R, Green
B, Bruce RA: Prognostic value of ST elevation
during low level treadmill testing early after
myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1982; 49:932.
31. Haines DE, Beller BA, Watson DD, Kaiser DL,
Sayre SL, Gibson RS: Exercise-induced ST segment
elevation two weeks after uncomplicated myocardial
infarction: contributing factors and prognostic
significance. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 9:996.

*Director, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Cardiology & Cardiovascular Surgery Dept., Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
|
|