CASE REPORT
CASE REPORT - A
Combined One-stage Coronary Surgery and Extended Radical Nephrectomy
Case report and review of the literature
SRune Haaverstad1, MD PhD, Fikri Abdullah1 MD FRCS, Peter H. Groves2 MD FRCP,
Philip N. Matthews3, MB BS FRCS
1Departments of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom, 2Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom,
and 3Department of Urology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Patient 1
Patient 2
Two patients with renal cell carcinoma that extended into the inferior vena
cava (IVC) to the level of the hepatic veins and
also had coronary artery disease are presented.
Both patients underwent a one-stage combined coronary
revascularization and extended right nephrectomy
with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass, deep hypothermia
and circulatory arrest.
When pre-operative angioplasty is not feasible,
a one-stage combined operation for ischaemic heart
disease and advanced renal carcinoma with IVC
extension can be performed safely.
(Heart Views. 2001;2(2): 69-72) © 2001 Hamad Medical
Corporation.
Key Words:
Renal cell carcinoma
Inferior vena cava Coronary disease
Coronary artery bypass surgery
Renal cell tumors have a propensity for
involving the IVC and may even grow up
into the right atrium.
Radical nephrectomy and complete resection of tumor thrombus is still the only potentially curative treatment for these patients.
If the tumor thrombus is extending into the retrohepatic IVC (level 3) or further into the right atrium (level 4) (1), surgical resection of the tumor should be performed through a combined thoraco-abdominal approach.
Many surgeons now believe that the safest method of removing all visible tumour tissue is with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) (2,3).
When pre-operative assessment reveals simultaneous significant coronary artery disease, the treatment is even more challenging and a well-planned surgical strategy is warranted.
Two cases that illustrate a primarily successful one-stage combined extended nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy and coronary bypass surgery are presented.
A 60-year-old man was referred with a 12-month history of general lethargy, weight loss, night sweats, intermittent right loin pain and a palpable abdominal mass.
He was an ex-smoker with a marked limitation of physical activity, equivalent to a Canadian Cardiovascular Society class 3 angina.
Thoraco-abdominal MRI revealed a 12 x 10 cm right-sided renal mass with tumor thrombus extending into the retrohepatic IVC up to the level of the hepatic vein (Fig 1).
Following a positive exercise electrocardiogram (ECG), coronary angiography showed a significant ostial stenosis of the left main stem, as well as proximal stenoses in the left anterior descending (LAD) and obtuse marginal (OM) arteries.
The operation commenced with a midline laparotomy to confirm tumor operability.
This was extended into a median sternotomy, and the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) as well as the long saphenous vein was harvested.
Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was initiated and the patient was systemically cooled, whilst simultaneously
|
Fig. 1 MRI (transverse section) of a large
right-sided renal tumour invading the inferior
vena cava
|
the urologist continued to display the tumor and the IVC.
Once the IVC was satisfactorily exposed and the
core temperature reached 15oC, circulatory arrest
was commenced and the patient was exsanguinated.
After exploration of the IVC through a longitudinal
venacavotomy, the entire tumor thrombus was removed
from below and the IVC was closed with continuous
monofilament 3/0 suture.
Circulation was then re-established and systemic
rewarming commenced after a circulatory arrest
time of 29 minutes.
During rewarming, a standard radical nephrectomy
was carried out. Further, the coronary surgery
could proceed following cross clamping of the
ascending aorta and with the use of warm blood
cardioplegia.
Separate saphenous vein grafts were directed to
the first OM and a large diagonal artery.
A pedicle LIMA graft was anastomosed to the LAD.
After 30 minutes the cross clamp was released
and two proximal anastomoses were performed.
CPB was easily discontinued followed by a stable
hemodynamic condition. Except for mild temporary
renal failure and a right pleural effusion requiring
chest tube drainage, there were no major postoperative
complications.
The patient was discharged home on the tenth postoperative
day.
Histopathological examination of the tumour specimen
confirmed a well-differentiated renal cell carcinoma
without any extra-capsular spread.
Postoperatively, warfarin was given for three
months and then replaced by aspirin.
He initially did well following his surgery, but
14 months later he developed liver metastases
and died 17 months after his nephrectomy.
|
Fig. 2 MRI (sagital section) of a large
tumour thrombus from a renal cell carcinoma
involving the intrahepatic part of the inferior
vena cava
|
A 46-year-old man was referred with three months history of general lethargy, painless hematuria, and a palpable right hypochondriac mass.
He was a heavy smoker, but without any family history of heart disease.
Ultrasound, CAT and MRI scans collectively confirmed the presence of a large right-sided renal tumor with retrohepatic IVC extension to the level of the right hepatic veins (Fig 2).
A pre-operative exercise ECG showed ischemia of the inferior myocardial wall.
A subsequent coronary angiography revealed single-vessel disease with significant stenosis of a dominant right coronary artery (RCA).
A similar operative protocol was carried out as in the first patient with the use of CPB and DHCA. One coronary anastomosis between a SVG and the distal RCA was performed during the cooling phase without cross clamping of the aorta.
The tumor thrombus was adherent to the IVC wall and therefore an atriotomy was performed to facilitate the dissection from above.
The circulatory arrest time was 56 minutes with retrograde cerebral perfusion being performed for ten minutes. The proximal anastomosis was carried out during the rewarming period.
Acute tubular necrosis that required hemodialysis, as well as a hemopericardium that needed subxiphoidal drainage of the pericardium
on the nineteenth post-operative day, delayed the recovery.
Histopathological examination of the kidney confirmed renal cell carcinoma.
He stayed on warfarin and remained dialysis dependent for the following five months and then the remaining kidney started producing urine.
Six months following surgery he was readmitted to hospital with an acute confusional state and a subsequent CT scan showed cerebral metastases. He died a few days later.
Extended radical nephrectomy and venacavotomy with complete resection of IVC thrombus is mandatory for the potential achievement of long-term survival.
The level of the cephalic extension of the IVC involvement does not appear to be of prognostic importance as opposed to regional lymph node metastases and infiltration of the tumor thrombus into the IVC wall, which are both signs of a poor outcome (2, 4).
There is disagreement about the necessity of CPB in the surgery of patients with tumors that extend behind the liver, but not above the diaphragm (5).
We believe that a key factor is the width of tumor thrombus in the retrohepatic IVC.
In both of these cases the IVC was greatly distended by the tumour and the only way of being sure that the IVC was cleared was to have a good bloodless exposure.
Operating without CPB and DHCA invariably leads to bleeding from lumbar veins that can be very difficult to control and sometimes necessitates cross clamping of the aorta.
It has been suggested that the routine use of CPB and DHCA may decrease peri-operative morbidity and mortality, especially relating to proximal embolization of the tumor thrombus (3,6).
In our institution over the last 11 years, 21 patients with renal carcinoma and tumor thrombus into the retrohepatic IVC have routinely been treated with the use of CPB and DHCA, and there has only been one perioperative death.
Our initial experience has previously been reported (7).
Both patients were referred with an advanced renal carcinoma with extensive involvement of the IVC, but without any signs of metastatic spread at the time of surgery.
Without surgical treatment even their short-term prognosis was expected to be poor.
They were both rare cases as they also suffered from severe coronary artery disease.
The main indications for a combined one-stage operation have been either a left main stenosis or severe triple vessel disease (8-11).
In the first patient routine grafting with LIMA and SVG was feasible as part of a combined operation with the use of CPB and DHCA.
In the second case a SVG was anastomosed to a dominant RCA, as angioplasty had not been done before the operation took place.
The one-stage combined approach was chosen to avoid any delay before the cancer operation could go ahead. As the coronary surgery was performed during the systemic cooling and rewarming phase, any prolonged circulatory arrest time was avoided.
The use of cardiopulmonary bypass or cell-saver in cancer patients is controversial, as it could potentially promote systemic dissemination of malignant cells.
However, the filtering mechanism of the heart-lung machine may be efficient in avoiding hematogenous tumor spread during surgery (3,11).
In patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma, pre-operative assessment for coronary disease should be carried out routinely.
If myocardial ischemia is suspected, a coronary angiogram and possible angioplasty should be performed pre-operatively.
If there is severe coronary disease and angioplasty is not feasible, we believe that a well-planned combined one-stage procedure can be carried out with relative safety.
1. Neves RJ, Zincke H. Surgical
treatment of renal cancer with vena cava extension.
Br J Urol
1987;59:390-5.
2. Cocco Glazer AA, Novick AC. Long-term
followup after surgical treatment for renal
cell carcinoma
extending into the right atrium. J Urol 1996;155:448-50.
3. Hatcher PA, Everett Anderson E,
Paulson DF, Carson CC, Robertson JE. Surgical
management
and prognosis of renal cell carcinoma invading
the vena cava.
J Urol 1991;145:20-4.
4. Welz A, Schmeller N, Schmitz C,
Reichart B, Hofstetter A. Resection of
hypernephromas
with vena caval or right atrial tumour extension
using
extracorporeal
circulation and deep hypothermic arrest: a multidisciplinary
approach.
Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg 1997;12:127-32.
5. Matthews PN, Evans C, Breckenridge
IM. Involvement of the inferior vena cava by
renal tumour:
surgical excision using hypothermic circulatory
arrest.
Br J Urol
1995;75:441-4.
6. Belis JA, Levinson ME, Walter
EP. Complete radical nephrectomy and vena caval
thrombectomy
during circulatory arrest. J Urol 2000;163:434-6.
7. Nesbitt JC, Soltero ER, Dinney
CPN, Walsh GL, Schrump DS, Swanson DA, et al.
Surgical
management of renal cell carcinoma with inferior
vena cava tumor
thrombus.
Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:1592-600.
8. Wickey GS, Martin DE, Larach
DR, Belis JA, Kofke A,Hensley FA. Combined carotid
endarterectomy,
coronary revascularization and
hypernephroma
excision with hypothermic circulatory arrest.
Anesth Analg
1988;67:473-6.
9. Belis JA, Pae WE, Rohner
TJ, Myers JL, Thiele BL, Wickey GS, Martin DE.
Cardiovascular
evaluation before circulatory arrest for removal
of vena caval
extension
of renal carcinoma. J Urol 1989;141:1302-7.
10. DeSouza E, Klingman RR, Peetz D, Alberttucci
M, Tyndall S.
Extension
of renal cell carcinoma into the vena cava with
concomitant coronary
artery
disease:
surgical
considerations. Nebr Med J 1991;76:274-7.
11. Akcurin RS, Davidov MI, Partgulov SA,
Brand SA, Shiriaev AA, Lepilin MG, Dolgov IM.
Cardiopulmonary
bypass and cell-saver technique in combined oncologic
and
cardiovascular
surgery.
 Artificial
Organs 1997;21:763-5.
|