|
PREGNANCY IN A PATIENT WITH
NON-HODGKIN LYMPHOMA
Habib F.A.
Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, King Khalid
University Hospital Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
 Introduction:
The overall incidence of lymphoma during pregnancy
has not been established accurately. Hodgkin’s
disease is the fourth most frequently diagnosed
cancer in pregnancy (1 in 1000 to 1 in 6000 pregnancies)(1).
In contrast, the incidence of non- Hodgkin lymphoma
during pregnancy is rare, with fewer than one
hundred cases reported(2). A case of small intestinal
lymphoma in association with pregnancy is presented,
with emphasis on the major clinical issues involved
in the approach to the management of such cases.
  Case
Report:
In May 1998 a 32-year-old woman, gravida four,
para three, in her 29th week of pregnancy, was
admitted with a two month history of abdominal
pain, vomiting and distension. Signs of malabsorption
were marked. Examination revealed the presence
of an epigastric mass with evidence of intestinal
obstruction. Fine needle aspiration of the mass
revealed cells showing high grade malignancy with
the possibility of the tumour being a lymphoma
or sarcoma of the small intestine. Serum electrolytes,
liver function tests and renal function tests
were normal. Examination of blood and coagulation
profiles showed moderate anaemia and a prolongation
in the coagulation time.
At 30 weeks of gestation, the pregnancy was terminated
by an elective lower segment caesarean section
and a normal female infant weighing 1000 grams
was delivered. The apgar score was 7 at 1 minute
and 8 at 5 minutes. After the caesarean section
a general surgeon carried out multiple resection
of obstructing small bowel lymphomata, with removal
of regional lymph nodes. The liver, spleen, kidneys,
stomach and large bowel were normal.
Histology of the tumour revealed non-Hodgkin
lymphoma, of the B-cell (Malt) type, Stage II
A. Bone marrow biopsy showed no involvement with
lymphoma. After complete post-operative recovery
the patient received combination chemotherapy
of CHOP (Cyclophosphamid, Doxorubicin, Vincristine
and Prednisolone) for six cycles. She improved
clinically after treatment and gained six kilograms
in weight
Five months later another intestinal mass was
diagnosed in the terminal ileum and biopsy showed
a recurrent high grade lymphoma. The patient received
chemotherapy with ESHAP Protocol (ETOPOSID VP16,
Cisplatin, methylprednisolone and ephosphomide)
for five cycles followed by radiotherapy, as there
was no response to the chemotherapy. Four months
later the patient died but the child is still
in good health.
  Discussion:
Malignant neoplasm of the small bowel in association
with pregnancy is infrequent(4) but, on the other
hand, lymphomas do occur predominantly in the
ileum(3). As with other neoplastic conditions,
the diagnosis of non-Hodgkins Lymphoma (NHL) in
pregnancy is often delayed and the accurate assessment
of the stage of lymphoma is almost impossible
because of the pregnant uterus in the abdomen(4).
The diagnosis of this disease in pregnancy puts
immense stress on the pregnant women, their families
and on the physicians caring for them. Potential
harm to the women from the delayed diagnosis,
staging or therapy, and the risk to the baby from
radiation or chemotherapy creates severe pressure
and a need for prompt decisions as to the optimum
time to deliver the baby.
The approach to treatment should be individualized
according to the period of gestation, stage and
localization of the disease, the presence or absence
of B symptoms (fever, night sweats, and weight
loss of more than 10% of the original weight six
months prior to first attendance) and the progression
of symptoms and signs. The nature of the histology
should also be considered(5).
The treatment of NHL in pregnancy is problematic
because radiotherapy and chemotherapy are potentially
teratogenic(6,7). The risks and benefits of immediate
and early delivery and the resultant risk of prematurity
should be weighed against a delay in therapy until
foetal maturity is achieved, at which stage the
malignancy may have spread beyond control.
Because of the aggressive nature of this malignancy,
the decision was made to begin treatment of the
lymphoma immediately after surgery. In our choice
of management, while the health and safety of
both the mother and the foetus were considered,
the priority was to treat the mother with curative
intent, since she had such a large and rapidly
growing tumour at the time of diagnosis and treatment
could not be safely delayed until foetal maturity.
Caesarean section at 30 weeks of gestation with
wide local resection of the tumour was therefore
followed by chemotherapy.
The response of patients to treatment varies
and carries inherent risks. The patient and family
should know that each cycle of most combination
chemotherapies carry an inherent risk of bone
marrow depression, hemorrhage and sepsis(8). They
should also be aware that, should the primary
treatment fail, the possibility for cure will
be less despite intensive therapy (9).
The optimal management of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
presenting in the small intestine has not been
established. Attempts to improve the outcome in
this patient, using combination chemotherapy and
consolidation radiotherapy were not successful(10)
and the experience under-scores the difficulty
in treating this aggressive form of lymphoma.
Although the outcome in this case was poor,
and can be attributed to the aggressive nature
of the disease, it confirmed that tumour masses
of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma greater than 10 cm in
size, represent a poor prognostic sign(10). This
case is reported to demonstrate the diagnostic
and management problems associated with this type
of lymphoma, especially in pregnancy. When confronted
with this problem, prompt and early therapy should
be initiated.
 References:
1. Ferlito A, Devaney SL, Devaney
KO, Carbone A, Rinaldo A, Maio M, et al. Clinico
Pathological Consultation: Pregnancy and malignant
neoplasm of the head and neck. Ann Otol Rhinol
Laryngol 1998; 107:991-8.
2. Kathy S. Stewart, Michael C. Gordon.
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Pregnancy presenting as
acute liver Failure. Obst & Gyne 1999; 94:847.
3. Benijts G, Thiery M, Bekaert
S, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the ileum during pregnancy.
Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol 1977; 7: 247-250.
4. Bergamdschi P, Magni M, Ricevuti
G. Reticulo sarcoma in gravidanza. Ann. Obstet
Gynecol Med Perinat 1973; 94: 255-264.
5. Yahalom J. Treatment options for
Hodgkin’s disease during pregnancy. Leukemia and
lymphoma 1990; 2: 151-161.
6. Korp GI, Oeyen P, Valone F, et
al. Cancer . J. Reprod Med 1983; 67: 773.
7. Sweet DL, Kinzia J. Consequences
of radio therapy and anti- neoplastic therapy
for the fetus. J. Reprod. Med. 1976; 17: 242-246.
8. Shiao Y. Woo, Lilian M. Fuller,
Jackson H. Cundiff, et al. Radiotherapy during
pregnancy for clinical stages IA - II A. Hodgkin’s
disease. Int J Radio Onco Bio Phs 1992; 23 (2):
407- 412.
9. Ralph J. Hauke, James O. Armitage.
Treatment of Non- Hodgkin lymphoma. Curr Opin
in Onco 2000; 12: 412-418.
10. Spitzer M, Citran M, Carl F,
et al. A Case report - Non- Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
during pregnancy Gyne Onco 1991; 43: 309-312.
|