|
DEVELOPMENTAL DYSPLASIA
OF THE HIP BEFORE AND AFTER INCREASING COMMUNITY
AWARENESS OF THE HARMFUL EFFECTS OF SWADDLING
Chaarani M.W., Al Mahmeid M.S.
and Salman A.M.
Orthopedics Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad
Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
Abstract:
Qatar is a small country with a population
of around 580,000. Over a period of 14 months
a study was conducted on 520 infant hips to compare
the results of ultra sound scanning of 260 “high
risk” babies; half of them (130) scanned before
and the others scanned after increasing public
awareness of the possible serious consequences
of swaddling on neonate hips. Before this public
awareness, of 130 babies scanned in a six months
period 26 showed a form of acetabular dysplasia
(20%), eighteen mild, four moderate and four severe.
Two months after the public was made aware that
swaddling could cause harmful effects on infants’
hips, 130 babies were scanned in a six months
period. The number of babies with hip dysplasia
was reduced to eight (6%), six mild, one moderate
and another had severe acetabular dysplasia.
Key Words: Developmental Dysplasia of the
Hip (DDH), before swaddling, after swaddling,
ultrasound scanning of the hips.
 Introduction:
The habit of swaddling is a common tradition
in the Middle East that goes back hundreds of
years. It is done by wrapping the baby either
with many bandages or garments or with a long
strip of material wrapped around the baby’s body
(Figure 1). Both methods fix the hips in an extended
and adducted position that can seriously affect
the development of the acetabulum. The extension
and adduction position may lead to hip dislocation
during the neonatal period(1) as shown experimentally
in animal hips(2). Epidemiological studies performed
in countries such as Japan(3), Turkey(4) and an
observation made in the Eastern province of Saudi
Arabia(5) correlated a high incidence of dislocated
hip with the use of swaddling for the newborn.
 |
|
Figure 1: Swaddling with
a long strip
|
Although it is quite clear in the literature
that swaddling is harmful to babies with acetabular
dysplasia it is surprising that clinicians who
are aware of this increased incidence do not warn
parents of the disadvantages of this practice.
The term “Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip“
(DDH) has replaced the term “Congenital Dislocation
of the Hip” because a hip put under unfavorable
conditions can deteriorate. That is why communities
that practice swaddling have a higher rate of
DDH as swaddling may prevent the acetabulum from
correct development. If there is muscle imbalance
leading to persistent hip adduction of an otherwise
normal hip can change gradually into a subluxed
and dislocated hip, as is very common in neuromuscular
disorders such as cerebral palsy(6). In neonates
the majority of dysplastic and dislocated hips
can improve to normal under favorable conditions
(flexion and abduction) such as the position in
a Pavlik harness(7). Most hips that have minor
acetabular dysplasia during the neonatal period
recover spontaneously within a few weeks(8,9).
The aim of this prospective study was to show
the importance of public awareness that swaddling
has harmful effects on infant hips and to show
the immediate reduction of the number of infants
with acetabular dysplasia after mothers became
aware of the harmful effects of swaddling.
  Method:
An ultrasound clinic for hip scanning was held
one morning a week to cater for the many mothers
bringing high risk babies for examination. For
the last two years a Pediatric Orthopaedic surgeon
has been present and most babies at risk were
given an ultrasound appointment after an average
of six to eight weeks.
After birth the babies were examined clinically
by a neonatologist and all hips were routinely
screened for DDH. All those with hips at risk
were referred for ultrasound screening. The risk
factors included breech presentation, family history
of DDH, hips clicking, limited hip abduction and
some other rare indications.
The ultrasound machine was a Real Time Siemens
Sonoline SL 1 with a 5 MHz linear transducer.
A black and white thermal paper video printer
was used for documentation of the results. The
babies were examined using the technique described
by Graf(10, 11) to obtain a standard static sonographic
plane of section for hips documented by pictures
of right and left hips and graded according to
Graf’s classification(12).
The orthopaedic surgeon noticed that, even though
swaddling was a common practice in the region,
families who had babies at risk were not warned
of the hazards. Many of these swaddled babies
had hip problems ranging from mild acetabular
dysplasia to complete hip dislocation.
The awareness of the neonatologists of the serious
consequences was increased by a lecture (MW Chaarani:
Surgical Neonatology Symposium, 3rd May 2001,
Qatar) and a memo requesting improved public education.
A common reaction from mothers (and particularly
from grandmothers) was that swaddling was an ancient
practice that had not harmed them, so why should
it harm their offspring? Patience, trust, and
obvious concern for their babies was necessary
to win them over. Some refused point blank to
change the practice. Others appeared to understand
and would express agreement and gratitude for
the advice even while they were swaddling their
babies ready to leave the clinic!
Of 520 infant hips from 260 “high risk” babies
examined and scanned by ultrasound over a period
of 14 months, 130 babies (50%) were scanned before
and the remainder after attempts to increase public
awareness of the consequences of swaddling.
  Results:
One hundred and thirty babies with hips at risk
had ultra sound examination of their hips in a
six month period from 16th October 2000 to 16th
April 2001. Twenty six babies had a form of acetabular
dysplasia, (20%), eighteen of these were mild,
four moderate and four severe (Table 1). Seventeen
were Qatari and nine various other nationalities.
Two months after the consequences had been publicized
another 130 babies were studied and scanned by
ultrasound during the six month period from 2nd
July 2001 to 7th January 2002. Eight of these
babies (six Qatari, two non-Qatari) had a form
of acetabular dysplasia (6%), showing a 14% drop
in the incidence of acetabular dysplasia between
the first and second groups. Six were mild, one
moderate and one severe (Table 2).
|
|
Age at which US was
done (in weeks)
|
Reason for referral
|
Nationality
|
Sex
|
US Results
Right
|
US Results
Left
|
|
1
|
12
|
Breach
|
Qatari
|
F
|
Normal
|
II a
|
|
2
|
10
|
Breach
|
Iranian
|
F
|
II a
|
II a
|
|
3
|
6
|
Breach
|
Qatari
|
M
|
Normal
|
II a
|
|
4
|
10
|
Breach
|
Egyptian
|
M
|
Normal
|
II a
|
|
5
|
1
|
Breach
|
Qatari
|
F
|
II a
|
II a
|
|
6
|
13
|
Breach
|
Qatari
|
F
|
II b
|
II b
|
|
7
|
13
|
Breach
|
Qatari
|
M
|
II b
|
Normal
|
|
8
|
2
|
Breach
|
Qatari
|
F
|
II a
|
II a
|
|
9
|
10
|
Breach
|
Qatari
|
M
|
II a
|
II a
|
|
10
|
6
|
Family History
|
Qatari
|
M
|
II a
|
II a
|
|
11
|
3
|
Family History
|
Qatari
|
F
|
II a
|
II a
|
|
12
|
15
|
Left Hip Click
|
Qatari
|
F
|
II b
|
II b
|
|
13
|
1
|
Left Hip Click
|
Qatari
|
F
|
II a
|
II a
|
|
14
|
10
|
Left Hip Click
|
Egyptian
|
M
|
II a
|
Normal
|
|
15
|
1
|
Left Hip Click
|
Pakistani
|
F
|
II a
|
II a
|
|
16
|
14
|
Reduced Hip Abduction
|
Egyptian
|
F
|
II a
|
Normal
|
|
17
|
9
|
Reduced Hip Abduction
|
Egyptian
|
F
|
Normal
|
II a
|
|
18
|
6
|
Meningomyelocele
|
Pakistani
|
M
|
Normal
|
II a
|
|
19
|
12
|
Breach
|
Qatari
|
F
|
II c
|
II c
|
|
20
|
10
|
Breach
|
Egyptian
|
M
|
Normal
|
II c
|
|
21
|
11
|
Breach
|
Qatari
|
F
|
II a
|
II c
|
|
22
|
11
|
Breach
|
Qatari
|
F
|
II c
|
II a
|
|
23
|
1
|
Unstable Left Hip
|
Yemeni
|
F
|
Normal
|
D
|
|
24
|
1
|
Unstable Left Hip
|
Qatari
|
F
|
II c
|
D
|
|
25
|
2
|
Reduced Hip Abduction
|
Qatari
|
F
|
III a
|
D
|
|
26
|
28
|
Unable to Stand
|
Qatari
|
F
|
IV
|
III a
|
|
Table 1: US results of
260 hips, done before public awareness.
|
|
|
Age at which US was
done (in weeks)
|
Reason for referral
|
Nationality
|
Sex
|
US Results
Right
|
US Results
Left
|
|
1
|
13
|
Breach
|
Qatari
|
M
|
II b
|
II a
|
|
2
|
10
|
Breach + Family History
|
Qatari
|
F
|
II a
|
Normal
|
|
3
|
9
|
Family History
|
Yemenii
|
M
|
II a
|
II a
|
|
4
|
16
|
Family History
|
Qatari
|
F
|
II b
|
II b
|
|
5
|
5
|
Left Hip Click
|
Qatari
|
M
|
II a
|
Normal
|
|
6
|
5
|
Dislocate Left Hip
|
Pakistani
|
F
|
Normal
|
II a
|
|
7
|
2 days
|
Family History
|
Qatari
|
F
|
II a
|
II c
|
|
8
|
5
|
Breach
|
Qatari
|
F
|
III a
|
D
|
|
Table 2: US result of 260
hips, done 2 months after increased public
awareness.
|
  Discussion:
The acetabulum of an infant is formed of two
parts, an inner bony part and an outer cartilaginous.
If the hip is put into extension and adducted,
the femoral head will press on the cartilaginous
part of the acetabulum, possibly affecting its
growth and ossification and leading to acetabular
dysplasia, hip subluxation and dislocation. In
the literature there appears to be no disagreement
that swaddling can cause further deterioration
of hips at risk. Swaddling alone does not cause
hip dislocation but it can have an unfavorable
effect on the future progress of a dysplastic
hip, i.e. swaddling can be only a contributing
factor in the development of congenital hip pathology
after birth if some abnormality of the hip or
the area around the hip already exists at birth(13).
It is necessary to differentiate between risk
factors of acetabular dysplasia in utero and extra-uterine
(perinatal) risk factors. If perinatal risk factors
are favorable the hip will have a better chance
to grow to normal, if unfavorable there can be
serious deterioration(14, 15).
The regular presence of an orthopaedic surgeon
in the ultrasound clinic had many advantages.
Parents of affected babies could be given immediate
instructions and a management plan tailored according
to the severity without waiting for outpatient
orthopaedic appointments. That families with babies
at risk of acetabular dysplasia were not being
warned of the hazards of swaddling was an important
observation by the orthopedic surgeon which led
to this study.
Publicity appeared to produce good results. Within
a few months swaddling became occasional rather
than common, and ultrasound screening showed a
sharp decline in the number of dysplastic hips.
When asked why their babies are not swaddled mothers
were likely to reply that they had heard that
the practice was not good. However, Qatar is a
relatively small community and news spreads very
quickly. In other areas more intensive efforts
might be necessary if swaddling is to become past
history not only for Qatar but for the whole of
the Middle East. It is not news that swaddling
has an adverse effect on developmental acetabular
dysplasia but this pilot study shows how an immediate
improvement can be achieved when mothers are made
fully aware of the serious consequences.
  Conclusion:
We recommend immediate national campaigns. Already
one is planned in Qatar in conjunction with the
Health Media and Public Relations Department of
Hamad Medical Corporation using material prepared
in English and Arabic, and possibly later in other
commonly used expatriate languages. We look forward
to the golden sands of the desert soon covering
the age-old tradition of swaddling.
  Acknowledgement:
We thank both the late Dr. William M. George
for his assistance and Mrs. Deepa Sasidharan,
Orthopedic Secretary, for her patience and cooperation
while preparing this manuscript. We also thank
Health Media and Public Relations Department,
Hamad Medical Corporation, for their understanding
and help in persuading the community to abandon
swaddling.
 References:
1. Coleman SS; Diagnosis of congenital
dysplasia of the hip in the new born infant. Clinical
Orthop 1989: 247: 3-12.
2. Salter RB; Role of innominate
osteotomy in the treatment of congenital dislocation
and subluxation of the hip in the older child.
J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1966: 48: 1413-39.
3. Nito K; Congenital dislocation
of the hip J Jpn Orthop Assoc 1958: 13: 1086-92.
4. Kuttlu A, Memik R, Mutlu M, Kutlu
R, Arslan A, Congenital dislocation of the hip
and its relation to swaddling used in Turkey.
J Pediatric Orthop 1992: 12: 592-602.
5. Abu Nawarig M , Congenital dysplasia
of the hip in Eastern province of Saudi Arabia.
Orthop Rev 1981: 10: 35-9.
6. Lonstein JE., Karen Beck; Hip
dislocation and subluxation in cerebral palsy
J. Pediatric Orthopedics 1986: 6: 521-526.
7. Malkawi H. Sonographic Monitoring
of the treatment of developmental disturbances
of the hip by the Pavlic harness. J of Pediatric
Orthop Part B 1998: 7: 144-149.
8. Barlow TG. Early diagnoses and
treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip
J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1972: 54: 4-11.
9. Mitchell G P. Problems in the
early diagnosis and management of congenital dislocation
of the hip. J. Bone Joint Surg (B) 1972: 54: 4-11.
10. Graf R.: Guide to sonography
of the infant hip Stuttgart Thieme 1987.
11. Graf R: Schuler P. Translated
by Telger T. Sonography of the infant hip: an
Atlas. Weinhein: VCH Verlaglsgesellschaft mbH,
1986.
12. Graf R : Classification of hip
joint dysplasia by means of sonography. Arch Orthop
Trauma Surg 1984: 102: 248-55.
13. Stanisavljevic S; Part I: Etiology
of congenital hip pathology. I n tachdjian MO,
ed; congenital dislocation of the hip. New York:
Churchill Livingstone, 1982: 27-34.
14. Mckibbin B. Anatomical factors
in the stability of the hip joint in new born.
J Bone Joint surg 1970: 52B: 148-59.
15. Dunn PM. Perinatal observation
of the etiology of congenital dislocation of the
hip. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1976: 119: 11-22.
|