Volume 4/ Number 1/ March 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 










 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Case Report #1 

MAJOR VASCULAR INJURY DURING 
LUMBAR MICRODISCECTOMY

 

Abstract
Patient Report 
Discussion 
Conclusion
References

 

Abstract 

     Major vascular injury during lumbar discectomy is a rare complication of one of the commonest surgical procedures performed in the Neurosurgical unit.

     Its occurrence may be associated with high morbidity and mortality, particularly if it is not diagnosed at an early stage. 

     We illustrate, in our case, the early manifestations of the injury and the associated hypovolemic shock. In addition, we describe the management approach and the mechanism of this injury.

     Other types of injuries will be referred to during the discussion of this case.


Patient Report

     A 38-year-old male, weighing 63 Kg with hemoglobin level of 16.1 gm/L and ASA I, was scheduled for L5/S1 microdiscectomy. 

     Anesthesia was induced with Propofol 150 mg, Fentanyl 250 µg and Pancuronium 8 mg.  The patient was intubated and was then turned into prone position on Wilson's frame, and anesthesia was maintained by O2/Air and Isoflurane with continuous infusion of Remifentanil.

     After four hours of surgery, the surgeon noticed excessive bleeding from the surgical site associated with a drop in the blood pressure to 85/43, which responded to an immediate fluid transfusion.  One hour later, there was another severe drop of blood pressure to 57/30 and tachycardia of 114/ min, which were reasonably corrected with an infusion of crystalloids and colloids.  Here we suspected the possibility of vascular injury, as the volume of blood loss from the operation site did not match with the hypotensive episodes that the patient had. At the end of surgery and on turning the patient into the supine position, the patient was hemodynamically unstable; in addition, the patient showed a localized swelling on the left side of the abdomen.

     The vascular surgeon was called upon urgently.  During that period central venous catheter, arterial line, Foley catheter and nasogastric tube were all inserted.  A Cell saver and a Level 1 System Pressure Infuser were requested.  Meanwhile, we decided to reduce the fluid resuscitation until the surgeon was able to secure the bleeder.  A longitudinal abdominal mid line incision was performed, then posterior peritoneal dissection of the infra renal part of the aorta, and both common iliac arteries, revealed a  1.5 cm irregular tear that was situated on the posterior wall of the aorta and one cm above the bifurcation.  This was repaired using Dacron mesh.  The resuscitation fluids included six units of each of the following: Packed Red Cells, Fresh Frozen plasma, Platelets concentrate, Cryoprecipitate and a total of 9.5 L of crystalloids and colloids.

     Prior to the laparotomy the patient's laboratory results were Hemoglobin 6.2 gm/L and a pH of 7.072.  In the immediate postoperative period, the results were Hemoglobin 14.2 gm/L and a pH 7.237.  Sodium Bicarbonate was not given.

     Postoperatively, the patient was kept on the ventilator, his hemodynamics were stable as well as his renal profile. He was extubated after a few days and discharged from the hospital after 15 days without obvious neurological deficit. However, on interviewing him, he complained of lack of concentration and loss of appetite.


Discussion

     Symptomatic perforation of the anterior spinal ligament has an overall incidence of 17 per 10,000 cases (1). The history of vascular injury during disc surgery goes back to 1945 when it was first reported by Linton and White (2).   Since then, there have been many other reports about this type of injury.  Vascular injury may involve the left iliac artery, which is the most common injury as it lies immediately anterior to L4/5 disc space, the right iliac artery, the aorta, the inferior vena cava, the iliac veins and formation of arteriovenous fistulae. Therefore, this type of injury may be presented in various ways such as hypovolemic shock (3, 4) or heart failure (5).  There are other injuries recorded during lumbar discectomy such as visceral and ureteral (6, 7, 8).  However, major vascular injury remained the most serious with a high percentage of mortality.

     Goodkin and Laska (9) have collected 21 cases of injuries during lumbar discectomy for the period between 1985 and 1998 that underwent litigation.  However, the real number of injuries were imprecise.  In their collection, only 18 of those cases were vascular injuries.  One third of the injured were diagnosed in the operating room and in 50 percent of those, the diagnoses were delayed. The mortality rate was 33.3 percent.  One third of the patients with major vascular injury showed bleeding into the disc space; other signs such as abdominal distension and hypotension were delayed.

    Perforation of the anterior longitudinal ligament by may be performed by either a Pituitary rongeur (fig 1), forceps or a curette.  This perforation is usually the first sign noticed by the surgeon in such cases.

     There are many other predisposing factors to this kind of injury such as peridiscal fibrosis (10), previous intra-abdominal surgery, and surgery for recurrent disc herniation.  The anatomical proximity of the major vessels to the vertebral bodies (fig 2) as well as other abdominal structures are other factors that make this type of injury possible.

     There are several possible reasons behind the delay in the diagnosis of some of these cases, some of which are:  a) the tamponade effect in the prone position, which may keep a tear in a vessel sealed (especially a venous tear) until the patient is turned to the supine position, b) the small surgical site, especially in microdiscectomy, using an operating microscope, and c) blood seeps to the retroperitoneal area which may let the injury go undetected by the surgeon

     High suspicion was practiced in this case, an additional large caliber intravenous cannula was inserted and extubation was delayed at the conclusion of surgery until patient's condition was verified.  Pending securing the injured vessel, we reduced the resuscitation fluid to avoid raising the blood pressure fearing ongoing bleeding. Mattox et al.(11) have purported to show that aggressive fluid resuscitation is not beneficial in patients with truncal penetrating trauma who are able to have rapid operation.

     However, there is no evidence from randomized controlled trials for or against early volume of intravenous fluid administration in uncontrolled hemorrhage in prehospital settings (12).  


Conclusion

     Lumbar laminectomy and microdiscectomy are common surgical procedures in Neuro and Orthopedic units. One major sign that should alert the anesthesiologist to the possibility of this injury is unexplained hypotension and tachycardia.  In young and healthy patients, 30 to 40 percent of total blood volume must be lost before signs of hypovolemia arise.  

     Early detection of these major vascular injuries is crucial in saving patients lives.  However, there are times when this type of injury is diagnosed late, either in the recovery room or even one day later (13, 14), therefore the nursing staff must be aware of this possibility.

     We think that Hydroxyethyl Starch (HES) was not a good choice for resuscitation.  Conditions where HES should be used, with caution, are major trauma and increased blood loss where a possibility of coagulopathy due to HES may lead to further blood and blood components transfusion and therefore transfusion risks (15).


References

Other Topic:

Case Report #  2 -   Atrial Fibrillation Caused by Dermal Application of Permethrin