|
Abstract
Objectives: The link between alcohol,
substance abuse and major trauma is well
established. This study is the first to
assess the prevalence of alcohol and
drug intoxication in major trauma
admissions to two hospitals in Lebanon.
Subjects and Methods: A cohort of
sixty-three injured patients were
enrolled in this study. Testing for
serum alcohol and urine drugs of abuse
was performed for these patients who
were sequentially selected depending
upon defined criteria.
Results: Thirty percent (19/63) of the
patients tested had positive toxicology
results. Twenty five percent (16/63)
were positive for alcohol and 21%
(13/63) were positive for drugs of
abuse, out of which 61.5% (8/13) were
positive for tetrahydrocannabinol (THC,
a marijuana metabolite) and 38% (5/13)
were positive for benzodiazepines. All
THC positive patients were also positive
for alcohol. Sixteen percent (10/63) of
the patients were concurrently positive
for alcohol and substance abuse. Car
crashes were the cause of trauma in 75%
(47/63) of the cases. Patients positive
for benzodiazepines were involved in
more severe accidents. Conclusions:
Screening for drugs of abuse is
recommended for all trauma patients,
particularly for those with evident
alcohol abuse.
Key Words: Trauma, Toxicology, Alcohol,
Drugs of Abuse, Lebanon
Introduction
Alcohol and substance abuse are major
contributing factors in adult trauma all
over the world. This is often compounded
by poor decision-making and multiple
risk taking behaviors (1,2). While
alcohol is involved in most traffic
fatalities (2), drugs intoxication has
also been linked to other injuries as
well: 40-60% of serious head injuries,
30-60% of fatal burns, 50-60% of
hypothermia fatalities, up to 40% of
fatal falls, up to 50% of drownings, and
over 50% of homicides experienced by
adults involve one or more individuals
who are intoxicated (3).
Lebanon is a
Middle Eastern Country with an area of
10400 km2 and estimated population of
3,505,794. Sixty four percent of the
population is aged between 15-64 years,
among which the male:female ratio is 0.9
(4). Lebanon has been known for its
production of hashish for many years. Up
to the beginning of the Lebanon war in
1975, legislation was passed to limit
the production of drugs (5). However, a
dramatic increase in the production(6),
abuse and trafficking of drugs was
witnessed during the Lebanon war (5)
that ended in 1990. Estimates on drug
addiction during the war period revealed
that 100,000 persons were taking drugs
in Lebanon (7). Heroin was the most
widely abused product, often in
combination with hashish and cocaine
(8). A clear link between the war
situation and use of drugs was revealed
by the study conducted in 1993 by the
United Nations Drug Control Program (UNDCP)
(9). Data collected in 1994,and later in
2000, showed a drop in drug users in
institutions dealing with drug abuse
(10) and University students (6),
simultaneously.
Taking into
consideration the high number of deaths
due to traffic accidents in Lebanon (313
deaths and 3586 injuries in 2326 car
crashes for the year 2000)(11), it
becomes important to investigate the
correlation between trauma, alcohol and
drug abuse in the country; especially as
previous studies were mostly limited to
psychiatric patients and University
students (6,10,12).
This prospective
observational study was undertaken in
order to investigate the prevalence of
alcohol and illicit drugs in major
trauma admissions to two Lebanese
Hospitals located in the cities of
Beirut and Byblos. Accordingly, trauma
protocols can be modified in Lebanese
hospitals to better manage these cases
and introduce intervention procedures to
minimize their impact on the population.
Subjects and Methods
Subjects and
Methods The project was reviewed and
accepted by the Institutional Review
Board of the American University of
Beirut - Faculty of Medicine and Notre
Dame Maritime Hospital in Byblos.
Informed consents were obtained from
patients before enrollment in the study.
The selection criteria used in this
study was that outlined in the triage
decision scheme that is recommended by
the American College of Surgeons (13).
The inclusion criteria were:
Glasgow
Coma Scale <14, systolic blood pressure
<90, respiratory rate <10 or >29,
revised trauma score <11, all
penetrating injuries to head, neck,
torso, and extremities proximal to elbow
and knee, flail chest, combination
trauma with burns, two or more proximal
long-bone fractures, pelvic fractures,
limb paralysis, amputation proximal to
wrist and ankle, ejection from the
automobile, death in the same passenger
compartment, extrication time >20
minutes, falls >20 feet, rollover,
high-speed auto crash, auto-pedestrian
/auto-bicycle injury with significant
(>5mph) impact, pedestrian thrown or run
over, and motorcycle crash (>20mph) or
with separation of rider from bike. All
patients with preexisting clinical
conditions were excluded so that their
condition or treatment will not be the
causative reason for the trauma.
Subjects anonymity was maintained by the
use of special numbers. This study was
carried out from January 2000 to March
2001. During this period 2739 patients
were admitted to the two hospitals. Only
80 patients met the inclusion criteria.
Consents were provided for 63 patients.
Two out of the 17 patients who did not
consent had a traumatic brain injury and
were intubated, four were in coma, six
were missed due to unavailability of
study staff, and the remaining five
refused to consent. Samples were taken
systematically from all patients who fit
the time, space, and inclusion criteria
defined for the study and not upon
suspicion of abuse. Blood for alcohol,
in simple tube, and urine for drugs of
abuse screen, were obtained upon arrival
of trauma patients in the Emergency
Department of each institution.
Alcohol
was analyzed in serum by enzymatic
method on Vitros 250 (Johnson & Johnson
Clinical Diagnostics, Rochester, NY,
U.S.A.). The method has a reportable
range between 10 - 300 mg/dl. The
precision was 4.1% and 4.0% at mean
concentrations of 87.7 and 217.5 mg/dl,
respectively. Triage Drugs of Abuse
PANEL PLUS TCA (Biosite Diagnostics, San
Diego, CA, U.S.A.) was used for the
qualitative determination of the
presence of the major metabolites of
drugs of abuse in urine. The cut off
levels of these screening tests were
those recommended by the Substance Abuse
and Mental Health Services
Administration (SAMHSA)(14). These
cut-off concentrations are: 25 ng/ml for
phencyclidine, 300 ng/ml for
benzodiazepines (BZD), 300 ng/ml for
cocaine (benzoylecgonine), 1000 ng/ml
for amphetamines, 50 ng/ml for
tetrahydrocannabinol
(11-nor-(9-THC-9-carboxylic acid) (THC),
300 ng/ml for opiates (morphine), 300 ng/ml
for barbiturates, and 1000 ng/ml for
tricyclic antidepressants (TCA). The
data collected included age, sex, day of
the accident, time of the day, trauma
mechanism, length of hospital stay,
blood alcohol and urine toxicology
results, and radiology results. A
radiology result was considered positive
when any bone fracture was evident by
X-ray or an anatomic lesion due to the
accident was detected by computed
tomography (CT) scan.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical
Analysis Statistical analysis was
performed using Stata version 6.0. Odds
ratio and comparison of proportions were
used to investigate the relationship
between different categorical data (such
as mechanism of trauma and toxicology
results). The t-test was used to check
differences between numerical data.
Logistic regression was used to
investigate the relationships between
multiple categorical variables. A
p-value of 0.05 or less was considered
statistically significant.
Results
Results As described under methods, the 63 patients enrolled in the study had to
fit the trauma selection criteria set
forth in the beginning of the study.
Male predominance was evident with a sex
ratio of 6:1 (54:9). The median age was
30 years (mean was 34 years) with a
range of 16-75 years. When investigating
the time of admission to emergency
units, it was evident that admissions
were distributed through out the 24 hour
period; equally through all days of the
week, with 22% between 4pm-8pm and 25%
between 8pm-12pm. Average length of stay
was 2.5 hours in the emergency unit and
3 days in the Hospital for those
admitted. Four of the study patients
died in the hospital. As for trauma
mechanisms: car crashes were the cause
in 47 patients (75%), falls from heights
above 20 feet were the cause in 8
patients (13%), motor cycle crashes in 3
patients (5%), in addition to other
minor causes (Table 1)
|
Table 1 : Mechanisms of
trauma |
All 63 patients had a blood alcohol
level measurement and 62 were screened
for drug use. Positive results were
obtained for 19 patients (30%). Sixteen
patients (25%) were positive for alcohol
and 13 (21%) were positive for drugs of
abuse. Ten of these patients (16%) were
positive for both simultaneously (Figure
1). Median alcohol result were 100 mg/dl
(Figure 2).
|
Figure 1 :Positive findings
for alcohol and drugs of
abuse |
|
Figure 2 :Box plot showing
distribution of alcohol
results |
Toxicology screening was positive for
THC, benzodiazepines, opiates,
amphetamines, and TCA and the mechanism
of trauma was car crash in 92% (12/13)
of the cases (Table 2). All (8/8) THC
positive and 60% (3/5) of benzodiazepine
positive patients were also positive for
alcohol and were all involved in car
crashes (Table 2).
|
Table 2 :Distribution of
data by type of drug
patients |
THC positive patients
also had higher mean alcohol of 104 ±40
mg/dl versus 74 ± 27 mg/dl for drug
negative patients (p=0.08, t-test). None
of the THC positive patients had
positive radiology results. However, 60%
of benzodiazepine positive cases had
positive radiology findings (p=0.01,
comparison of two proportions), thus
suggesting that benzodiazepines abuse
results in more severe accidents than
THC and alcohol abuse. In trying to
identify possible risk factors for drug
intoxication in trauma patients and to
limit screening to a more targeted
population, statistically significant
risk factors determined from our data
were: younger age, Saturday accidents,
alcohol, and admission time between 12pm
- 4am. Drug intoxicated patients had a
mean age of 28.6 years versus 36.1 years
for negative patients (p=0.039, t-test).
Saturday accidents, alcohol, and
admission time between 12pm - 4am were
individually correlated to drugs of
abuse (p<0.001, comparison of two
proportions). The risk of drug abuse was
independent of sex, radiology findings,
length of stay in Emergency unit and
Hospital, and mechanism of accident.
When logistic multivariate regression
analysis was performed on the four
predictors of drug abuse among our
trauma patients, alcohol was the only
statistically significant predictor
(p=0.013) (Table 3).
|
Table 3 :Multivariate
logistic regression analysis
for predictors of drugs
abuse |
Although the
frequency of admissions due to accidents
increased in the period between 4pm and
12pm with a similar trend in the
severity as indexed by positive
radiology findings, the frequency of
severity, however, was the highest after
midnight (Figure 3). The percentage of
drunk and/or drugged patients peaked
between 12pm and 4am following a unimodal distribution, as reflected in
Figure 3.
|
Figure 3 : Percentages of
accidents, positive
radiology, positive alcohol
and drugs by admission time |
Discussion
The aim of this
study was to investigate the prevalence
of alcohol and drugs of abuse in major
trauma admissions, and to narrow the
indication for drug
screening to a more targeted population.
We found a prevalence of 30% ± 10% of
alcohol and/or drugs of abuse, which are
comparable to reported rates of 30-45%
in the United States (3). This high
prevalence justifies screening major
trauma admissions for alcohol and drugs.
However, if screening were to be
restricted to a more targeted
population, it should be done for
younger patients (below 30 years), who
are admitted to the Emergency units on a
Saturday, or after midnight, and
particularly when positive for alcohol.
In a multivariate analysis, alcohol was
found to be the only predictor of drug
abuse. Consequently, for cost
containment, it would be possible to
screen for drugs the alcohol- positive
trauma patients (25% of trauma victims)
(Figure1).
For those with unknown alcoholemia, testing for alcohol should
be performed first and then drug
screening is suggested if the former is
positive. This approach will identify
76% of drug users (Figure 1), if
screening for all is not possible. In a
previous study by Parran et al. (3), it
was indicated that major trauma combined
with laboratory evidence of intoxication
at the time of admission is virtually
synonymous with a diagnosis of chemical
dependence. Therefore, toxicology
testing on admission is ethically sound
and is not significantly different from
obtaining other routine laboratory tests
for the clinical management of the
patients. In addition, a positive blood
alcohol concentration in injured
patients after a road crash increases
the chance that the final diagnosis will
include more injuries than initially
documented. Therefore, more careful
monitoring is needed in alcohol-positive
trauma patients independent of clinical
status, injury severity, and overt
symptoms of alcohol intoxication (15).
It is also better for interventions to
occur after an alcohol-positive motor
vehicle crash while the patient is still
hospitalized which provides a better
opportunity to decrease drinking
(16,17).
In our study, 25% of those
severely injured patients were positive
for alcohol and fit the above mentioned
literature. But, when we look at the
most severe cases among our study group,
subjects who were positive for
benzodiazepines were associated with
more severe accidents as determined by
radiology findings, where as alcohol and
THC positive patients were not.
Published literature shows differing
conclusions regarding these
relationships. In France it was
determined, in a case controlled study,
that a casual role exists for opiates,
alcohol, cannabinoids (and a combination
of the last two compounds) in car
crashes (18). Nevertheless, a similar
Australian study revealed a significant
relationship between alcohol,
benzodiazepines and responsibility for
the car crash, but this relation was not
significant for cannabinoids and
stimulants (19).
Our data confirms the
world wide differential prevalence of
substance abuse in males when compared
to females (4:1) (2). A ratio of 8-10:1
was reported for Lebanon in 1993 (12).
Previous studies conducted after the war
in the early 1990s revealed that heroin
was the most widely abused drug in
Lebanon. However, marijuana dominated in
this study and this could be due to more
stringent governmental policies against
illicit drugs in recent years. Nowadays,
the access to heroin is limited;
however, hashish or marijuana is still
accessible to the population. The
growing of hashish is widely spread in
some areas of the country, but the
government is seriously exerting all
efforts to destroy all the cultivated
areas (20). The absolute association
between THC and alcohol revealed in our
study could be indicative of a social
activity, especially as it is mostly
occurring on Saturday nights. However,
this observation requires further
investigation. In conclusion, alcohol
and drug abuse are highly prevalent, and
measures to contain their use are
needed. These can include immediate
administration of alcohol breath test by
traffic police, restriction of access to
benzodiazepines, and combating of
hashish. Screening for drugs of abuse is
recommended for all trauma admissions,
and particularly for those with evident
alcohol abuse. Studies on a larger
scale, covering all districts of the
country, are recommended to better
identify trends and help setup
appropriate intervention procedures.
Acknowledgements: The authors would like
to acknowledge Dr. Nizam Peerwani, Chief
Medical Examiner, Tarrant County, Texas,
for his support and review of the
manuscript. The authors also would like
to thank Colonel Charbel Mattar for his
assistance in contacting patients and
collection of data regarding the
accidents.
References
Other
Topics:
Original Study # 1
- Relationship Between Anxiety and
Stress Hormones .
Original Study # 3
- Risk Factors for Duodenal Ulcer Perforation.
Original Study # 4
- arsometatarsal
Dislocations and Fracture-Dislocations
|