>  About Qatar

 
 

>  Visa & Hotels

 
 

>  Social Activities

 
 

>  Scientific Program

 
 

>  Committees

 
 

>  Abstract

 
 

>  Training Courses

 
 

>  Fees

 
 

>  Speakers

 
 

>  Abstract Form

 
 

>  Registration Form

 
 

>  Main Topics

 
 

 

 


Dr. Christian Muller

 

Speakers


 

Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

UNIV.PROF.DR.CH. MUELLER
UNIVERSITAETSKLINIK FÜR INNERE MEDIZIN IV
KLINISCHE ABTEILUNG FÜR GASTROENTEROLOGIE UND HEPATOLOGIE
WAEHRINGER GÜRTEL 18-20
1090 WIEN
TEL: +43-1-40400-4792
FAX: +43-1-40400-4794
E-MAIL: CHRISTIAN.J.MUELLER@MEDUNIWIEN.AC.AT


Introduction: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the complications of chronic liver disease and liver cirrhosis. It is the leading cause of death from malignant diseases worldwide. Hepatocellular carcinoma is characterized by the almost exclusive development in cirrhotic livers:
less than 10% of HCC originate in non-cirrhotic livers. The underlying etiology of liver disease influences the risk for HCC: patients with HBV, HCV or genetic hemochromatosis associated cirrhosis are at high risk, patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and PBC are at moderate risk and non cirrhotic HBV or HCV carriers or patients with autoimmune hepatitis associated cirrhosis have a comparably low risk for HCC.

In the western world HCC is a disease of elder patients (median age at diagnosis around 60 years) whereas in developing countries and in Southeast Asia it is also very often seen in young people. In industrialized nations HCC is characteristically detected relatively late in the course of the disease: in more than 50% the tumour is already multifocal at the time of diagnosis. This advanced stage at diagnosis results in a very low proportion of patients eligible for liver resection or liver transplantation.

Diagnosis: Every mass lesion in cirrhotic livers should be considered suspicious of HCC as long as not proven otherwise. Blood supply for HCC nodules comes usually from the hepatic artery whereas blood supply to cirrhotic nodules is from the portal vein. This difference is the basis for contrast enhanced spiral CT to detect HCC. However, not all tumour nodules might be detectable by spiral CT, some are only seen by ultrasound, some others only using MRI techniques. The most often used tumour marker alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) has a moderate sensitivity for detecting HCC. In about 20% of HCC AFP levels are normal and in only one-third of tumours AFP levels are >400ng/L and, therefore, considered diagnostic. The definite diagnosis is made by ultrasound-, CT- or MR-guided biopsy. Tumour seeding along the path of the needle has been observed in singular cases, but is a rare complication overall.

Prognosis: Due to the usually far advanced stage at the time of diagnosis prognosis is poor. Median survival time at the time of diagnosis is around 8 months, but is dependent on the stage of the liver cirrhosis (Child A, median survival 21 months; Child C, median survival 2 months). Multivariate analysis of various prognostic variables showed several independent variables to be associated with poor prognosis: Bilirubin > 2mg/dl, Portal vein thrombosis PTZ < 70%, AFP > 180mg/L. Tumour mass > 50% of liver mass, and the presence of enlarged lymph nodes.

Treatment of HCC: Several treatment modalities have been proposed and vividly promoted; this mirrors the generally insufficient treatment success. Many prognostic factors have been described of which the overall liver function is of most importance. Many patients with HCC don’t die due to the tumour but due to complications of the underlying liver cirrhosis. A well preserved overall liver function is also important therapeutically because many treatment methods don’t destroy the tumour only, but also non-tumour bearing liver tissue and might therefore contribute to liver failure. Only randomized clinical trials can establish the benefit of specific treatment regimens. Unfortunately, most of the randomized clinical studies for treatment of HCC have produced only negative or inconclusive results. Despite the general lack of randomized clinical trials with convincing results several therapeutic strategies are regularly used:

Liver transplantation: Liver transplantation, where available, is the only treatment which treats the tumour and the underlying precancerous disease that is liver cirrhosis. At present the so-called Mazzoferro-criteria are most often used to determine suitability of a patient for liver transplantation: one tumour nodule less than 5 cm in diameter or a maximum of 3 tumour nodules each less than 3 cm in diameters. Liver transplantation in those patients results in an overall survival which is similar to that seen in patients transplanted for liver cirrhosis without tumours. In contrast, liver transplantation in patients with more advanced HCC is associated with a high probability of recurrence of disease and a clear decrease in survival rate.

Tumour resection: Tumour resection is another potential a curative approach, which, however, has some problems of its own: mortality is high, even in well compensated Child A liver cirrhosis patients (up to 15%in some series). Strict selection criteria are necessary to reduce perioperative mortality, which at the same time reduces the number of eligible patients: Less than 10% of patients with HCC in industrialized countries are candidates for resection therapy. In addition, the risk of newly developing tumours might be as high as 80-90% within 5 years. Both, metastatic tumours of the primary HCC as well as de novo HCC in the remaining cirrhotic liver are seen.

(Chemo-) embolisation therapy: Embolisation therapy treats the tumour by closing the tumour-feeding artery, which usually comes from branches of the hepatic artery. Various embolisation materials are used: the oily contrast medium lipiodol, gel foam preparations, coils, or beads which might also be loaded with cytostatic drugs (TACE = transarterial (Chemo)Embolisation). Embolisation leads to an ischemic necrosis of the tumour. It might be, but it is not completely clear, that the addition of cytostatic drugs to the embolisation material enhances the anti-tumour effect. Most single randomized clinical studies of embolisation therapy did not show any convincing survival benefit. However, a metaanalysis of 5 RTC’s suggests a slight reduction in two year mortality in patients treated with TACE.

Percutaneous alcohol installation (PEI): An alternative approach is to destroy the tumour by ultrasound-, CT- or MR-guided alcohol instillation. HCC is a hypervascular tumour surrounded by a fibrotic capsule: injected 95% ethanol diffuses within the HCC nodules, and leads to selective tumour necroses.

In general, tumour nodules less than 3-5cm are well suited for such an approach. The smaller the tumour the higher the probability of a complete tumour destruction. Some groups treat HCC with larger diameters (up to 10cm), others inject higher volumes of ethanol (50-150ml) in one session in patients under general anaesthesia. One advantage of PEI is that it might also be applied safely to patients with advanced liver cirrhosis; clear contraindications are Child C patients, massive ascites and bleeding tendency. The therapeutic effect might be documented with CT, MR or ultrasound. Shrinkage of the tumour is only observed to a small proportion of treated patients, the disappearance of contrast enhancement in contrast CT is the more reliable parameter indicating complete tumour necrosis. One year survival with PEI is between 60-100% and is similar to one-year-survival after HCC resection.

Radiofrequency ablation (RF): This method uses high frequency alternate current which is applied via a percutaneously inserted needle and results in local heat necrosis of the tumour. Its potential advantage compared to PEI is its higher predictability of the size of necrosis and its ability to induce necrosis beyond the fibrotic capsule of the tumour providing the opportunity to produce 1cm safety rings surrounding the tumour. Randomized controlled trials show that RF ablation has a better local anti-tumour effect than PEI leading to improved local control of the disease. Although some RTC suggest a survival benefit of patients treated with RF definite superiority of RF ablation over PEI has not been demonstrated. In addition, about 25% of the lesions are not treatable by RF ablation due to the unfavourable location of the tumour.

Other local therapies: Other therapeutic procedures such as microwave ablation, laser ablation, cryo-ablation have been proposed and used in treatment of HCC. However, these methods should still be considered as experimental due to limited experience.

Hormonal manipulation:

Anti-oestrogen: Several randomized controlled trials with the oestrogen receptor blocker tamoxifen have been performed and have shown variable results. The biggest double-blind placebo controlled study, which included more than 200 patients showed no survival benefit.

Somatostatin: The somatostatin analogue octreotide showed a survival benefit in randomized study of 58 patients with inoperable HCC (Survival 12 months 37 vs. 13 % in controls). However, two other randomized trials showed no survival benefit (median survival 1,9 vs. 1,9 months and 4.5 vs. 5 months respectively). It is possible that the negative results of the latter two studies are due to selection of very late stage HCC patients, a group in which it is extremely difficult to show a survival benefit.

Summary: More than 90% of HCC develop liver cirrhosis patients. HCC is detected usually very late. The median survival after diagnosis is around 8 months. Potentially curative treatment options are liver transplantation (eligible patient should have one tumour less than 5cm, or a maximum of 3 tumours less than 3 cm each) and resection of the tumour. Surgery, however, is only an option in the minority of patients with either HCC non-cirrhotic livers or in cirrhotic livers with well preserved hepatic function (Child A cirrhosis). Patients who are neither candidates for liver transplantation or surgery might benefit from local ablative therapy with TACE, RF or PAI. A metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials using TACE as compared to supportive treatment showed a benefit in survival of TACE treated patients. RF promises better local tumour control than PEI, it is, however, unclear whether this can also translate into an improved survival of patients. Patients with advanced stage HCC might benefit from treatment with somatostatin analogues, which are well tolerated and without major side effects. Prognosis of patients with HCC usually depends more dependent on stage of cirrhosis and on complications of liver disease (variceal bleeding, ascites and encephalopathy) than on the growth of the tumour.


 

 
 

Copyright © 2005 HMC. All Rights Reserved.