|
Osteoid Osteoma of the
Spine is an Important Cause of Back Pain:
Two Cases and Review
Al Maqdassy E.G., Bakdash
M.M.
Orthopedic Surgery Section,
Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation
Doha, Qatar
 Abstract
Two cases are reported and discussed of osteoid
osteoma in the spines of two children,
presenting as nocturnal low back pain irrelevant
to any position or activity. Plain radiographs
of the lumbo-sacral spine, Technetium-99 bone
scan and computerized tomography (CT) were used
to locate and verify the lesions. Both were then
excised by open surgery and confirmed by a
post-operative CT scan. A review of all the
known and updated modalities of diagnosis and
treatment is presented and it is emphasized that
this uncommon lesion should be considered in the
differential diagnosis of back pain in children.
Key words: Osteoid osteoma, Spine, Back
pain
  Introduction:
Primary bone
tumors of the spine are relatively infrequent
lesions compared with metastatic diseases,
multiple myeloma and lymphoma which are more
frequent and are usually multifocal lesions
posing few problems of diagnosis (1).
Osteoid osteoma is one of the most common benign
tumors of the spine and should be included in
the differential diagnosis of any young patient
with pain in the back, and it is also the most
common cause of painful scoliosis in adolescents(1-3).
It is a benign bone lesion with a nidus of less
than two centimeters surrounded by a zone of
reactive bone and it accounts for approximately
10% of all benign tumors, 13% percent of which
occur in the spine.
  Case
One:
A
seven-year-old girl complained of recurrent
attacks of pain in the lower back, right buttock
and posterior aspect of the right thigh for
about four months prior to admission. The pain
was almost constant at night but could be
relieved by a mild analgesic (acetaminophen).
Clinical examination showed no local tenderness
over the lower back and buttock; the
straight-leg raising test and gait were normal;
there were no neurological deficits or
scoliosis. Blood investigations were normal.
Plain radiographs of the lumbo-sacral spine
showed widening in the right hemilamina of L5
vertebra in the antero-posterior view, but no
scoliosis (Figure 1-A). Bone
isotope (Techni-tium-99) scan showed a small
focal active lesion confined to the right side
of L5 vertebra (Figure 1-B). The
computerized tomographic (CT) scan identified a
bone defect with a central nidus measuring about
7mm in diameter involving the right hemilamina
of L5, suggesting osteoid osteoma (Figure
1-C).
|
Figure 1-A: Plain radiograph
showing widening of right hemilamina
of L5 vertebra
|
|
Figure 1-B: Bone scintigraphy
showing focal activity in right
hemilamina of L5 vertebra
|
|
Figure 1-C: CT Scan of L5
vertebra showing the lesion with the
central nidus
|
The vertebra was explored through a midline
incision in the prone position and the lesion
was identified by an obvious local swelling
overlying the nidus, which was unroofed and the
central material was curetted and sent for
histopathology. The lesion was found to be
connected to the facet joint.
A
post-operative CT scan showed complete resection
of the lesion (Figure 1-D). The
histopathological report confirmed the diagnosis
of osteoid osteoma. The symptoms had disappeared
completely in the immediate post-operative
period and the child had a smooth recovery with
no recurrence of symptoms for three years.
|
Figure 1-D: Post-operative CT
scan showing complete intralesional
excision
|
  Case
Two
An eight-year-old boy complained of
long-standing non-radiating low back pain that
was worse at night but also could be relieved by
a mild analgesic (acetaminophen). During the
attacks he could hardly bend his back and walked
with an obvious stiffness with an inclination to
the right side. On clinical examination his
active spinal movements were restricted; passive
straight-leg raising on the right was also
limited; no neurological deficits were found.
Blood investigations were not significant.
Plain radiographs
of the lumbo-sacral spine showed a translucent
swelling with a central calcification in the
right hemilamina of S1 vertebra, with no
scoliosis (Figure 2-A).
Technitium-99 scintigraphy of this possibly
doubtful lesion showed a well-circumscribed
intense rounded focal uptake in the right side
of S1 vertebra (Figure 2-B).
|
Figure 2-A: Plain radiograph
showing widening of right hemilamina
of S1vertebra with a transluscent
lesion.
|
|
Figure 2-B: Bone scintigraphy
showing focal activity in right
hemilamina of S1 vertebra
|
A CT scan matched
the lesion seen in the plain X-rays and showed
focal bony destruction in the right hemilamina
of S1 with spotty calcification in a central
mass of soft tissue suggestive of osteoid
osteoma (Figure 2-C).
|
Figure 2-C: CT Scan of S1
vertebra showing the lesion with a
central calcific nidus
|
The spine was
explored by a midline incision in the prone
position and the lesion was easily identified by
obvious local swelling. It was unroofed first to
visualize the nidus and, as the remaining shell
was thin, the whole lesion was excised with a
wide zone of healthy bone. A post-operative CT
scan confirmed full excision (Figure 2-D),
while the histopathological result confirmed the
diagnosis. The child had an uneventful recovery
and the symptoms disappeared completely in the
early post-operative period with no recurrence
recorded for two years.
|
Figure 2-D: Post-operative CT
scan showing complete en bloc
resection
|
  Discussion:
Osteoid osteoma is a benign osteoblastic
neoplasm most often seen in young males,
frequently in the first three decades of life
and may be found in the cortical or cancellous
bone with a further five per cent reported as
subperiosteal, and multicentric foci were also
reported
(5,6). When
the lesion is periarticular or eroding the
articular surface, as in the first case,
symptoms will be related to the hypertrophic
degenerative arthritis resulting from the
concomitant pathologic changes in the joint
surfaces and synovial tissues
(4,6,7). This
explains the picture of sciatica in our patient,
in addition to the bony swelling caused by the
tumour itself.
Preliminary
diagnosis carries some difficulties, mostly due
to unawareness of the condition, leading to
delay in the management. The diagnosis of
persistent low back pain in children and
adolescents may require various procedures to
reach a final result, but the clinical features
and awareness of the presence of this lesion
will give a better hint and direction to the
goal
(1,3,5,8).
The first imaging procedure is usually the plain
radiography
(4,6,7,9),
which shows different pictures depending on the
location of the lesion (whether medullary or
cortical) and the degree of reactive sclerosis
surrounding the nidus. Typically it appears as a
radiolucent round or oval nidus with a dense
sclerotic reactive zone, particularly in the
diaphyseal cortical bone, but this zone may be
absent or the nidus may be opacified by
calcification or ossification, while lesions in
the pelvis and spine are usually difficult to
identify by plain radiographs(4,6,7,10).
The most important plain radiographic
differential diagnosis includes osteoblastoma,
Brodies abscess, stress fracture and enostosis(1,4).
Although
radioisotope imaging is not pathognomonic for
osteoid osteoma, it can be very useful in
diagnosis and anatomic location, intra-operative
and post-operative identification(3-5,7-10).
The sign of “double density image” is usually
created, which is fairly typical of osteoid
osteoma(5,7).
Occasional negative bone scans have been
reported(5).
Computerized
tomography is considered by many authors to be
the imaging method of choice in demonstrating
the nidus, particularly when extensive sclerosis
is obstructing it, or when the tumour is
localized in the pelvis or spine, as in our
cases
(3-5,7,8,10-12).
We also believe that CT is essential for optimal
planning before surgery is performed(13)
and for postoperative confirmation of complete
resection(14,15).
Magnetic imaging resonance although sometimes
used, is considered less specific in the
diagnosis(11,13).
Treatment can be
surgical or conservative. To achieve a surgical
cure the entire nidus must be removed
completely; this can be achieved either by open
methods or minimally invasive techniques.
En block resection can be performed much
more easily in the diaphysis of the long bones
in which the intraoperative localization of the
nidus, if needed, can be achieved either by
radioisotopes or fluorescence techniques(5-9).
Open intralesional resection
of the nidus by unroofing the lesion is another
method that is more helpful in regions where
wide resection may endanger the bone strength
itself or the surrounding structures, as in the
pelvis, proximal femur, long bones diaphysis and
the spine(6,7,9).
Campanacci et al(9)
claimed 100% primary cure using both these
methods. Others reported recurrence even after
en block resection(5,6).
Removal of the nidus by minimally invasive
techniques is becoming more widespread although,
due to incomplete removal, this may be less
successful at curing the pain and preventing
recurrence(7,9).
CT guidance is used, while the extraction is
done percutaneously either by intralesional
excision(5,11-17),
by thermocoagulation (radio-frequency thermal
ablation)(18,19),
by laser photocoagulation(20),
or by ethanol injection(9).
Donahue et al(22)
and Katz et al(14)
claimed a 100% cure rate with the percutaneous
CT-guided excision, while Sans et al(15)
claimed about 84% cure rate. Barei et al(17)
using the percutaneous CT-guided thermal
ablation had a success rate in 10 out of 11 in
his series, but they advised its use only on
extra spinal lesions that are not immediately
adjacent to neurovascular structures, while Cove
et al(18)
used it successfully in two cases with lumbar
spinal lesions. Campanacci et al(9)
found 83% primary cure in a collection of 247
cases reviewed in the literature, in which the
percutaneous technique of nidus removal had been
performed either by excision or coagulation.
Medical management
of osteoid osteoma is well recognized and is
usually needed whenever the lesion is
inaccessible even with the most carefully
planned surgical exposures, or is adjacent to a
vital neurovascular structures, or when the
patient refuses any operative interference.
Salicylates or other non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs can relieve the pain and
achieve a cure if used for a long period
approaching an average of thirty-three months(5-7,21,22).
Intolerance to such drugs will over-rule this
management.
In conclusion, we
believe that any child or adolescent complaining
of back pain, particularly long-standing, should
be investigated thoroughly, keeping in mind the
possibility of osteoid osteoma and that a plain
radiograph may not be significant in detecting
these lesions. It is obvious that multiple means
of excision are within the reach of surgeons to
be used accordingly in different sites of the
body.
 References:
1. Leone A, Costantini A,
Guglielmi G, Settecasi C, Priolo F. Primary bone
tumors and pseudotumors of the lumbosacral
spine. Rays 2000; 25: 89-103.
2. Heiman ML, Cooley CJ, Bradford
DS. Osteoid osteoma of a vertebral body: Report
of a case with extension across the
intervertebral disk. Clin Orthop 1976; 118:
159-63.
3. Schmitz A, Diedrich O, Schmitt
O. Sacral osteoid osteoma: A rare cause of back
pain in childhood and adolescence. Klin Padiatr
2000; 212: 110-2.
4. Bloem JL, Kroon HM. Osseous
lesions. Radiol Clin North Am 1993; 31: 261-78.
5. Carnesale PG. Benign tumors of
bone. In: Canale ST (ed.). Campbell’s Operative
Orthopaedics. St. Louis: Mosby; 1998: 691-92.
6. Huvos AG. Bone tumors,
diagnosis, treatment and prognosis.
Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company; 1979:
18-29.
7. Gitelis S, Schajowicz F:
Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma. Orthop Clin
North Am 1989; 20: 313-25.
8. Assenmacher S, Voggenreiter G,
Klaes W, Nast-Kolb D. Osteoid osteoma: A
diagnostic and therapeutic problem. Chirurg
2000; 71: 319-25.
9. Campanacci M, Ruggieri P,
Gasbarrini A, Ferraro A, Campanacci L. Osteoid
Osteoma: Direct visual identification and
intralesional excision of the nidus with minimal
removal of bone. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1999;
81: 814-20.
10. Banzo I, Montero A, Uriarte
I, Vallina NK, Hernandez A, Guede C, Quirce R,
Carril JM. Localization by bone SPET of osteoid
osteoma in the vertebral lamina. Rev Esp Med
Nucl 1999; 18: 47-9.
11. Farrokh D. Erroneous
diagnosis of subperiosteal osteoid osteoma:
Value of imaging techniques. J Radiol 1999; 80:
1572-4.
12. Hermann G, Abdelwahab IF,
Casden A, Mosesson R, Klein MJ. Osteoid osteoma
of a cervical vertebral body. Br J Radiol 1999;
72: 1120-3.
13. Jalel OA, Wulff C, Varmarken
JE. Osteoid osteoma of the cervical spine.
Ugeskr Laeger 2000; 162: 2446-7.
14. Katz K, Kornreich L, David R,
Horev G, Soudry M. Osteoid osteoma: Resection
with CT guidance. Isr Med Assoc J 2000; 2:
151-3.
15. Sans N, Galy-Fourcade D,
Assoun J, Jarlaud T, Chiavassa H, Bonnevialle P,
Railhac N, Giron J, Morera-Maupome H, Railhac JJ.
Osteoid osteoma: CT guided percutaneous
resection and follow-up in 38 patients.
Radiology 1999; 212: 687-92.
16. Voto SJ, Cook AJ, Weiner DS,
Ewing JW, Arrington LE. Treatment of osteoid
osteoma by computed tomography guided excision
in the pediatric patient. J Pediatr Orthop 1990;
10: 510-3.
17. Barei DP, Moreau G,
Scarborough MT, Neel MD. Percutaneous
radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma. Clin
Orthop 2000; 373: 115-124.
18. Cove JA, Taminiau AH,
Obermann WR, Vanderschueren GM. Osteoid osteoma
of the spine treated with percutaneous computed
tomography-guided thermocoagulation. Spine 2000;
25: 1283-6.
19. Gangi A, Dietemann JL, Gasser
B, Mortazavi R, Brunner P, Mourou MY, Dosch JC,
Durckel J, Marescaux J, Roy C. Interstitial
laser photocoagulation of osteoid osteomas with
use of CT guidance. Radiology 1997; 203: 843-48.
20. Kneisl JS, Simon MA. Medical
management compared with operative treatment for
osteoid-osteoma. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1992;
74: 179-85.
21. Spouge AR, Thain LM. Osteoid
osteoma: MR imaging of two untreated lesions.
Clin Imaging 1999; 23: 254-8.
22. Donahue F, Ahmed A, Mnaymneh
W, Pensner NH. Osteoid osteoma: Computed
tomography guided percutaneous excision. Clin
Orthop 1999; 366: 191-6. |