Vol.14 /No: 2/ Nov 2005

 

   

 

 

Insight into the New Changes in European Resuscitation
Council Guidelines for Adult Resuscitation (2005)

*Ibrahim W.,**Gehani A.A.
*Pulmonary Medicine Section, Department of Medicine
**Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery Department
Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar


References    


It is five years now since the last European resuscitation guidelines were published(1). The science of resuscitation has been enriched with further significant scientific evidence that has led to new evidence-based guidelines. These guidelines were released in November 2005 and published in the international Journal of Resuscitation, November 2005(2).

There are major changes to the previous guidelines, emphasizing that clinical guidelines must be updated regularly in order to advise health care providers on best practice. Nevertheless, guidelines in general do not define the only way that resuscitation should be achieved; they merely represent a widely accepted view of how resuscitation can be undertaken both safely and effectively(3).

The new guidelines aim not only at applying the best evidence available in the science of resuscitation but also focus on an easier approach for lay people and health care professionals. They pay much attention to the early recognition of very ill patients and the early prevention and treatment of cardiac arrest. The importance of recognizing critical illness and preventing cardiac arrest (in- or out-of-hospital) and post-resuscitation care has been highlighted by the inclusion of these elements in a new four-ring chain of survival(1).

According to the new guidelines, rescuers begin cardiopulmonary resuscitation if the victim is unconscious or unresponsive and not breathing normally. Checking for a carotid pulse has been omitted as it is an inaccurate method of confirming the presence or absence of circulation(5,6).

During the first few minutes after non-asphyxial cardiac arrest the blood oxygen content remains high and myocardial and cerebral oxygen delivery is limited more by diminished cardiac output than by a lack of oxygen in the lungs; therefore initial rescue breaths are less important than chest compression. This has led to the removal of the initial two rescue breaths from the BLS new guidelines(6,7).

During CPR, the new recommendation is to give each rescue breath over about 1 second, with enough volume to make the victim’s chest rise, but to avoid rapid and forceful breaths. This recommendation applies to all forms of ventilation during CPR, including
mouth to mouth and Bag-Valve-Mask (BMV)(6).


This is based on the following evidence:

1. During CPR blood flow to the lungs is substantially reduced so an adequate ventilation-perfusion ratio can be maintained with tidal volumes and respiratory rates lower than normal(8).

2. Not only is hyperventilation (too many breaths or too large volumes) unnecessary but it is harmful because it increases intra-thoracic pressure thus decreasing venous return to the heart and diminishing cardiac output; survival is consequently reduced(9).

3. When the airway is unprotected a tidal volume of 1 L produces significantly more gastric distention than a tidal volume of 500 ml(10).

4. Low minute ventilation (lower than normal tidal volume and respiratory rate) can maintain effective oxygenation and ventilation during CPR(11-14). During CPR a tidal volume of approximately 500 - 600 ml should be adequate.

5. Interruptions in chest compressions (for example to give rescue breaths) have a detrimental effect on survival(15). Giving rescue breaths over a shorter time will help to reduce the duration of essential interruptions.

A major change in the new guidelines is the emphasis on minimizing the interruptions of chest compressions. The new recommendation is to give 30 compression and 2 rescue breaths rather than the 15 and 2 in the guidelines of 2000(1). The reason behind this recommendation is that coronary blood flow decreases substantially when chest compressions are stopped and several compressions are then necessary before the coronary flow recovers its previous level(3,4).

There is insufficient evidence to support a specific hand position for chest compression during CPR in adults. The new guidelines recommend placing the heel of the hand in the center of the chest with the other hand on top(6).

The previous guideline of finding the middle of the lower half of the sternum by placing one finger on the lower end of the sternum and sliding the other hand down to it has been omitted.

Another major change from the previous guidelines is related to defibrillation. The new guidelines emphasize the importance of early defibrillation as the ability to deliver early defibrillation is one of the most important factors in determining survival from cardiac arrest. However these guidelines recommend, for out-of-hospital but not in-hospital VF or VT, to give a period of CPR for two minutes before defibrillation despite the evidence supporting this being weak and coming only from animal studies(16,17,18).

The recent guidelines recommend giving only one shock wave of 150-360 J of bi-phasic or 360 J of mono-phasic defibrillators, followed immediately by CPR for two minutes without the need to check for the rhythm or pulse after delivering the shock wave. The reason is to prevent interruptions of CPR during defibrillation as this is associated with post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction and reduced survival as well as reducing the chances of converting VF to another rhythm. Furthermore the first shock efficacy of biphasic wave forms exceeds 90% and failure to convert VF successfully is more likely to suggest the need for a period of CPR rather than a further shock.

Even if the defibrillation attempt is successful in restoring a perfusing rhythm, it is very rare for the pulse to be palpable immediately after defibrillation. Moreover, even if a perfusing rhythm has been restored, giving chest compressions does not increase the chances of VF recurring(15,16,19,20,21).


Here is a summary of the latest ERC Guidelines for Adult Resuscitation (12-03-2005) released by ERC:

A) Main changes in adult basic life support (Figure 1).

• The decision to start CPR is made if the victim is unresponsive and is not breathing normally.

• Rescuers should be taught to place the hands on the center of the chest instead of wasting time by using the “rib margin” method.

• Each rescue breath is given over 1 second rather than 2 seconds.

• The ratio of compression to ventilations is 30:2 for adult victims of cardiac arrest.

• For an adult victim the first two rescue breaths are omitted, with 30 compressions being given immediately after cardiac arrest is established.

B) Main changes in automated external defibrillation (AED).

• Public access defibrillation (PAD) programs are recom mended for locations where the expected use of an AED for witnessed cardiac arrest exceeds once in two years.

• A single defibrillatory shock (at least 150 J biphasic or 360 J monophasic) is delivered, followed immediately by 2 minutes of uninterrupted CPR without a check for termination of VF or a check for signs of life or a pulse.
 


Figure 1:  Adult basic life support

C) Main changes in adult advanced life support (Figure 2).
 


Figure 2:  Adult Basic Life Support Cardiac Arrest Algorithm


CPR before defibrillation:

• In an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest attended but not witnessed by health care professionals equipped with manual defibrillators, give CPR for 2 minutes (i.e. about 5 cycles at 30:2) before defibrillation.

• Don’t delay defibrillation if an out-of-hospital arrest is witnessed by a health care professional.

• Don’t delay defibrillation for in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Defibrillation strategy:

• Treat VF/pulseless VT with a single shock, followed by immediate resumption of CPR (30 compressions to 2 ventilations). Do not reassess the rhythm or feel for a pulse. After 2 minutes of CPR check the rhythm and give another shock (if indicated).

• The recommended initial energy for biphasic defibrillators is 150-200 J. Give second and subsequent shocks at 150-360 J.

• The recommended energy when using a monophasic defibrillator is 360 J for both the initial and subsequent shocks.


Fine VF:

• If there is doubt about whether the rhythm is asystole or fine VF, do not attempt defibrillation, instead continue chest compressions and ventilation.


Adrenaline:

• VF/VT: Give adrenaline 1 mg IV if VF/VT persists after a second shock. Repeat the adrenaline every 3-5 min thereafter if VF/VT persists.

• PEA/Asystole: Give adrenaline 1mg IV as soon as intravenous access is obtained, and repeat every 3-5 min thereafter until return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is achieved.


Anti-arrhythmic drugs:

• If VF/VT persists after three shocks, give amiodarone 300 mg by bolus injection. A further dose of 150 mg may be given for recurrent or refractory VF/VT, followed by an infusion of 900 mg over 24 hours.

• If amiodarone is not available lidocaine 1mg/kg can be used as an alternative but do not give lidocaine if amiodarone has been given already. Do not exceed a total of 3 mg/kg of lidocaine during the first hour.


Thrombolytic therapy for cardiac arrest:

• Consider thrombolytic therapy when cardiac arrest is thought to be due to proven or suspected pulmonary embolus. Thrombolysis may be considered in adult cardiac arrest on a case-by-case basis following initial failure of standard resuscitation in patients in whom an acute thrombotic etiology for the arrest is suspected. Ongoing CPR is not a contra-indication to thrombolysis.

• Consider performing CPR for up to 60-90 min when thrombolytic agents have been given during CPR.


Post resuscitation care - therapeutic hypothermia:

• Unconscious adult patients, with spontaneous circula- tion, after an out-of-hospital VF cardiac arrest should be cooled to 32-34؛C for 12-24 h.

• Mild hypothermia may also benefit adult patients after an out-of-hospital arrest, with spontaneous circulation, from a non-shockable rhythm or after a cardiac arrest in hospital.


References:

1. De la Torree F, Nolan J, Robertson C, Chamberlain D, Baskett P. European resuscitation council guidelines 2000 for adult advanced life support. A statement from the adult advanced life support working group. Resuscitation 2001; 48: 211-21.

2. European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation (2005). Resuscitation Nov. 2005.

3. Nolan J. Resuscitation (2005), 67S1, S3-6.

4. Kern KB, Hilwig RW, Berg RA, Ewy GA. Efficacy of chest compression-only BLS CPR in the presence of an occluded airway. Resuscitation 1998; 39: 179-88.

5. Bahr J, Klingler H, Panzer W, Rode H, Kettler D. Skills of lay people in checking the carotid pulse. Resuscitation 1997; 35: 23-6.

6. Handley AJ, Koster R, Monsieurs K, Perkin GD, Davies S, Bossert L. Resuscitation(2005)67S1, S7-23.

7. Kern KB, Hilwig RW, Berg RA, Sanders AB, Ewy GA. Importance of continuous chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Improved outcome during a simulated single lay-rescuer scenario. Circulation 2002; 105: 645-9.

8. Baskett P, Nolan J, Parr M. Tidal volumes which are perceived to be adequate for resuscitation. 1996; 31, 231-4.

9. Aufderheide TP, Sigurdsson G, Pirralo RG, et al. Hyperventila- tion induced hypotension during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation 2004; 109: 1960-5.

10. Wenzel V, Idris AH, Banner MJ, Kubilis PS, Williams JLJ. Influence of tidal volume on the distribution of gas between the lungs and stomach in the nonintubated patient receiving positive-pressure ventilation. Crit. Care Med 1998; 26: 364-8.

11. Idris A, Gabrielli A, Carusol. Smaller tidal volume is safe and effective for bag-valve ventilation. An animal model for basic life support. Circulation 1999; 100 (supp.1): 1-644.

12. Idris A, Wenzel V, Banner MJ, Melker RJ. Smaller tidal volumes minimize gastric inflation during CPR with an unprotected airway. Circulation 1995; 92(Supp): 1-759.

13. Dorph E, Wik L, Steen PA. Arterial blood gases with 700 ml tidal volume during out of hospital CPR. Resuscitation 2004; 61: 23-7.

14. Winkler M, Mauritz W, Hackle W, et al. Efeects of half the tidal volume during CPR on acid base balance and haemodynamics in pigs. Eur J Emerg Med 1998; 5: 201-6.

15. Eftestol T, Sunde K, Steen PA. Effects of interrupting precordial compressions on the calculated probability of defibrillation success during out of hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 2002; 105: 2270-3.

16. Deakin CD, Nolan JP. Resuscitation (2005) 67S1, S25-27.

17. Berg RA, Hilwig RA, Kern KB, Ewy GA. Precounter shock cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves ventricular fibrillation median frequency and myocardial readiness for successful defibrillation from prolonged VF: A randomized, controlled swine study. Ann Emerg Med 2002; 40: 563-70.

18. Kolarova J, Ayoub IM, Yi Z, Gazmuri RJ. Optimal timing for electrical defibrillation after prolonged untreated VF. Crit Care Med. 2003; 32: 2022-8.

19. Berg RA, Sanders AB, Kern KB, et al. Adverse hemodynamic effects of interrupting chest compressions CPR for VF cardiac arrest. Circ 2001; 104: 2465-70.

20. Bain AC, Swerdlow CD, Lone CJ. et al. multicenre study of principles -based waveforms for external defibrillation. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 37: 5-12.

21. Hess EP, White RD. Ventricular fibrillation is not provoked by chest compression during post shock organized rhythms in out of hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2005; 66: 7-11.

22. Nolan JP, Deakin CD, Soar J, Bottiger BW, Smith G. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation(2005) 67S1, S39-S86.

EDITORIAL