|
Insight into the New Changes in European
Resuscitation
Council Guidelines for Adult Resuscitation
(2005)
*Ibrahim
W.,**Gehani A.A.
*Pulmonary Medicine Section, Department of
Medicine
**Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
Department
Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
It is five
years now since the last European resuscitation
guidelines were published(1).
The science of resuscitation has been enriched
with further significant scientific evidence
that has led to new evidence-based guidelines.
These guidelines were released in November 2005
and published in the international Journal of
Resuscitation, November 2005(2).
There are major
changes to the previous guidelines, emphasizing
that clinical guidelines must be updated
regularly in order to advise health care
providers on best practice. Nevertheless,
guidelines in general do not define the only way
that resuscitation should be achieved; they
merely represent a widely accepted view of how
resuscitation can be undertaken both safely and
effectively(3).
The new guidelines
aim not only at applying the best evidence
available in the science of resuscitation but
also focus on an easier approach for lay people
and health care professionals. They pay much
attention to the early recognition of very ill
patients and the early prevention and treatment
of cardiac arrest. The importance of recognizing
critical illness and preventing cardiac arrest
(in- or out-of-hospital) and post-resuscitation
care has been highlighted by the inclusion of
these elements in a new four-ring chain of
survival(1).
According to the new
guidelines, rescuers begin cardiopulmonary
resuscitation if the victim is unconscious or
unresponsive and not breathing normally.
Checking for a carotid pulse has been omitted as
it is an inaccurate method of confirming the
presence or absence of circulation(5,6).
During the first few
minutes after non-asphyxial cardiac arrest the
blood oxygen content remains high and myocardial
and cerebral oxygen delivery is limited more by
diminished cardiac output than by a lack of
oxygen in the lungs; therefore initial rescue
breaths are less important than chest
compression. This has led to the removal of the
initial two rescue breaths from the BLS new
guidelines(6,7).
During CPR, the new
recommendation is to give each rescue breath
over about 1 second, with enough volume to make
the victims chest rise, but to avoid rapid and
forceful breaths. This recommendation applies to
all forms of ventilation during CPR, including
mouth to mouth and Bag-Valve-Mask (BMV)(6).
This is based on the following evidence:
1. During CPR blood flow to the lungs is
substantially reduced so an adequate
ventilation-perfusion ratio can be maintained
with tidal volumes and respiratory rates lower
than normal(8).
2. Not only is hyperventilation (too many
breaths or too large volumes) unnecessary but it
is harmful because it increases intra-thoracic
pressure thus decreasing venous return to the
heart and diminishing cardiac output; survival
is consequently reduced(9).
3. When the airway is unprotected a tidal volume
of 1 L produces significantly more gastric
distention than a tidal volume of 500 ml(10).
4. Low minute ventilation (lower than normal
tidal volume and respiratory rate) can maintain
effective oxygenation and ventilation during CPR(11-14).
During CPR a tidal volume of approximately 500 -
600 ml should be adequate.
5. Interruptions in chest compressions (for
example to give rescue breaths) have a
detrimental effect on survival(15).
Giving rescue breaths over a shorter time will
help to reduce the duration of essential
interruptions.
A major change in the new guidelines is the
emphasis on minimizing the interruptions of
chest compressions. The new recommendation is to
give 30 compression and 2 rescue breaths rather
than the 15 and 2 in the guidelines of 2000(1).
The reason behind this recommendation is that
coronary blood flow decreases substantially when
chest compressions are stopped and several
compressions are then necessary before the
coronary flow recovers its previous level(3,4).
There is insufficient evidence to support a
specific hand position for chest compression
during CPR in adults. The new guidelines
recommend placing the heel of the hand in the
center of the chest with the other hand on top(6).
The previous guideline of finding the middle of
the lower half of the sternum by placing one
finger on the lower end of the sternum and
sliding the other hand down to it has been
omitted.
Another major change from the previous
guidelines is related to defibrillation. The new
guidelines emphasize the importance of early
defibrillation as the ability to deliver early
defibrillation is one of the most important
factors in determining survival from cardiac
arrest. However these guidelines recommend, for
out-of-hospital but not in-hospital VF or VT, to
give a period of CPR for two minutes before
defibrillation despite the evidence supporting
this being weak and coming only from animal
studies(16,17,18).
The recent guidelines recommend giving only one
shock wave of 150-360 J of bi-phasic or 360 J of
mono-phasic defibrillators, followed immediately
by CPR for two minutes without the need to check
for the rhythm or pulse after delivering the
shock wave. The reason is to prevent
interruptions of CPR during defibrillation as
this is associated with post-resuscitation
myocardial dysfunction and reduced survival as
well as reducing the chances of converting VF to
another rhythm. Furthermore the first shock
efficacy of biphasic wave forms exceeds 90% and
failure to convert VF successfully is more
likely to suggest the need for a period of CPR
rather than a further shock.
Even if the defibrillation attempt is successful
in restoring a perfusing rhythm, it is very rare
for the pulse to be palpable immediately after
defibrillation. Moreover, even if a perfusing
rhythm has been restored, giving chest
compressions does not increase the chances of VF
recurring(15,16,19,20,21).
Here is a summary of
the latest ERC Guidelines for Adult
Resuscitation (12-03-2005) released by ERC:
A) Main changes in adult basic life
support
(Figure 1).
The decision to start CPR is made if the
victim is unresponsive and is not breathing
normally.
Rescuers should be taught to place the hands
on the center of the chest instead of wasting
time by using the rib margin method.
Each rescue breath is given over 1 second
rather than 2 seconds.
The ratio of compression to ventilations is
30:2 for adult victims of cardiac arrest.
For an adult victim the first two rescue
breaths are omitted, with 30 compressions being
given immediately after cardiac arrest is
established.
B)
Main changes in automated external
defibrillation (AED).
Public access defibrillation (PAD) programs
are recom mended for locations where the
expected use of an AED for witnessed cardiac
arrest exceeds once in two years.
A single defibrillatory shock (at least 150 J
biphasic or 360 J monophasic) is delivered,
followed immediately by 2 minutes of
uninterrupted CPR without a check for
termination of VF or a check for signs of life
or a pulse.
|
Figure 1: Adult basic life
support |
C)
Main changes in adult advanced life support
(Figure 2).
|
Figure
2: Adult Basic Life Support
Cardiac Arrest Algorithm |
CPR before defibrillation:
In an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest attended
but not witnessed by health care professionals
equipped with manual defibrillators, give CPR
for 2 minutes (i.e. about 5 cycles at 30:2)
before defibrillation.
Dont delay defibrillation if an
out-of-hospital arrest is witnessed by a health
care professional.
Dont delay defibrillation for in-hospital
cardiac arrest.
Defibrillation strategy:
Treat VF/pulseless
VT with a single shock, followed by immediate
resumption of CPR (30 compressions to 2
ventilations). Do not reassess the rhythm or
feel for a pulse. After 2 minutes of CPR check
the rhythm and give another shock (if
indicated).
The
recommended initial energy for biphasic
defibrillators is 150-200 J. Give second and
subsequent shocks at 150-360 J.
The
recommended energy when using a monophasic
defibrillator is 360 J for both the initial and
subsequent shocks.
Fine VF:
If there
is doubt about whether the rhythm is asystole or
fine VF, do not attempt defibrillation, instead
continue chest compressions and ventilation.
Adrenaline:
VF/VT: Give
adrenaline 1 mg IV if VF/VT persists after a
second shock. Repeat the adrenaline every 3-5
min thereafter if VF/VT persists.
PEA/Asystole:
Give adrenaline 1mg IV as soon as intravenous
access is obtained, and repeat every 3-5 min
thereafter until return of spontaneous
circulation (ROSC) is achieved.
Anti-arrhythmic drugs:
If VF/VT
persists after three shocks, give amiodarone 300
mg by bolus injection. A further dose of 150 mg
may be given for recurrent or refractory VF/VT,
followed by an infusion of 900 mg over 24 hours.
If amiodarone is not
available lidocaine 1mg/kg can be used as an
alternative but do not give lidocaine if
amiodarone has been given already. Do not exceed
a total of 3 mg/kg of lidocaine during the first
hour.
Thrombolytic therapy for cardiac arrest:
Consider
thrombolytic therapy when cardiac arrest is
thought to be due to proven or suspected
pulmonary embolus. Thrombolysis may be
considered in adult cardiac arrest on a
case-by-case basis following initial failure of
standard resuscitation in patients in whom an
acute thrombotic etiology for the arrest is
suspected. Ongoing CPR is not a
contra-indication to thrombolysis.
Consider
performing CPR for up to 60-90 min when
thrombolytic agents have been given during CPR.
Post resuscitation care - therapeutic
hypothermia:
Unconscious adult patients, with spontaneous
circula- tion, after an out-of-hospital VF
cardiac arrest should be cooled to 32-34؛C for
12-24 h.
Mild hypothermia may
also benefit adult patients after an
out-of-hospital arrest, with spontaneous
circulation, from a non-shockable rhythm or
after a cardiac arrest in hospital.
References:
1.
De la Torree F, Nolan J, Robertson C,
Chamberlain D, Baskett P. European resuscitation
council guidelines 2000 for adult advanced life
support. A statement from the adult advanced
life support working group. Resuscitation 2001;
48: 211-21.
2. European resuscitation council guidelines for
resuscitation (2005). Resuscitation Nov. 2005.
3. Nolan J. Resuscitation (2005), 67S1, S3-6.
4.
Kern KB, Hilwig RW, Berg RA, Ewy GA. Efficacy of
chest compression-only BLS CPR in the presence
of an occluded airway. Resuscitation 1998; 39:
179-88.
5.
Bahr J, Klingler H, Panzer W, Rode H, Kettler D.
Skills of lay people in checking the carotid
pulse. Resuscitation 1997; 35: 23-6.
6.
Handley AJ, Koster R, Monsieurs K, Perkin GD,
Davies S, Bossert L. Resuscitation(2005)67S1,
S7-23.
7.
Kern KB, Hilwig RW, Berg RA, Sanders AB, Ewy GA.
Importance of continuous chest compressions
during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Improved
outcome during a simulated single lay-rescuer
scenario. Circulation 2002; 105: 645-9.
8.
Baskett P, Nolan J, Parr M. Tidal volumes which
are perceived to be adequate for resuscitation.
1996; 31, 231-4.
9.
Aufderheide TP, Sigurdsson G, Pirralo RG, et al.
Hyperventila- tion induced hypotension during
cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation 2004;
109: 1960-5.
10.
Wenzel V, Idris AH, Banner MJ, Kubilis PS,
Williams JLJ. Influence of tidal volume on the
distribution of gas between the lungs and
stomach in the nonintubated patient receiving
positive-pressure ventilation. Crit. Care Med
1998; 26: 364-8.
11.
Idris A, Gabrielli A, Carusol. Smaller tidal
volume is safe and effective for bag-valve
ventilation. An animal model for basic
life
support. Circulation 1999; 100 (supp.1): 1-644.
12.
Idris A, Wenzel V, Banner MJ, Melker RJ. Smaller
tidal volumes minimize gastric inflation during
CPR with an unprotected airway. Circulation
1995; 92(Supp): 1-759.
13.
Dorph E, Wik L, Steen PA. Arterial blood gases
with 700 ml tidal volume during out of hospital
CPR. Resuscitation 2004; 61: 23-7.
14.
Winkler M, Mauritz W, Hackle W, et al. Efeects
of half the tidal volume during CPR on acid base
balance and haemodynamics in pigs. Eur J Emerg
Med 1998; 5: 201-6.
15.
Eftestol T, Sunde K, Steen PA. Effects of
interrupting precordial compressions on the
calculated probability of defibrillation success
during out of hospital cardiac arrest.
Circulation 2002; 105: 2270-3.
16.
Deakin CD, Nolan JP. Resuscitation (2005) 67S1,
S25-27.
17.
Berg RA, Hilwig RA, Kern KB, Ewy GA. Precounter
shock cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves
ventricular fibrillation median frequency and
myocardial readiness for successful
defibrillation from prolonged VF: A randomized,
controlled swine study. Ann Emerg Med 2002; 40:
563-70.
18.
Kolarova J, Ayoub IM, Yi Z, Gazmuri RJ. Optimal
timing for electrical defibrillation after
prolonged untreated VF. Crit Care Med. 2003; 32:
2022-8.
19.
Berg RA, Sanders AB, Kern KB, et al. Adverse
hemodynamic effects of interrupting chest
compressions CPR for VF cardiac arrest. Circ
2001; 104: 2465-70.
20.
Bain AC, Swerdlow CD, Lone CJ. et al. multicenre
study of principles -based waveforms for
external defibrillation. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 37:
5-12.
21.
Hess EP, White RD. Ventricular fibrillation is
not provoked by chest compression during post
shock organized rhythms in out of hospital
cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2005; 66: 7-11.
22.
Nolan JP, Deakin CD, Soar J, Bottiger BW, Smith
G. Adult advanced life support.
Resuscitation(2005) 67S1, S39-S86. |